rajabu vs hamad rajab ta rajabu auto spares others 2002 tzhc 3 22 march 2002

rajabu vs hamad rajab ta rajabu auto spares others 2002 tzhc 3 22 march 2002

The application was dismissed for want of prosecution and for being misconceived, as the legal provisions cited by the applicant do not apply to sales pursuant to a mortgage contract rather than a court order.

Citation
rajabu vs hamad rajab ta rajabu auto spares others 2002 tzhc 3 22 march 2002
Parties
Applicant/objector: Khashil Rajabu; Second Respondent: Godson M.T. Killiza (Company Secretary of FIDC Ltd); Respondents: OO!AD Rajabu t/a H/S Rajabu and Others
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
22 March 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Sale of Attached Property
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs for want of prosecution and lack of legal standing.
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Sale, Objection Proceedings, Execution of Decree, Mortgage
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Khashil Rajabu

Applicant/objector

Godson M.T. Killiza (Company Secretary of FIDC Ltd)

Second Respondent

OO!AD Rajabu t/a H/S Rajabu and Others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Sale of Attached Property

  1. 1 Whether the application to set aside the sale of attached property is maintainable under the Civil Procedure Code
  2. 2 Whether the sale was pursuant to a court order or a mortgage contract

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed for want of prosecution and for being misconceived, as the legal provisions cited by the applicant do not apply to sales pursuant to a mortgage contract rather than a court order.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs for want of prosecution and lack of legal standing.

Orders

  • Application by Khashil Rajabu dismissed with costs
  • Ruling delivered in presence of respondents' advocates and absence of applicant