19980904 TZHC Dar es Salaam2
- Citation
- 19980904 TZHC Dar es Salaam2
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 4 September 1998
- Posture
- Civil / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 4 September 1998
- Posture
- Civil / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The application fails because no points of law or fact were established to warrant certification for appeal.
Court disposition
dismissed
Orders
- application dismissed with costs
02
Material facts
Parties
Shani Ayurj
ApplicantSRSU'3
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Ukwonga03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil / Application for Leave to Appeal
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether there are points of law or fact warranting certification for appeal
- 02
Whether the application for leave to appeal should be granted
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant claims overwhelming chances of success if leave is granted, relying on affidavit evidence and written arguments.
- Respondent
- Respondent argues that the court's prior decision does not raise points of law or fact and the application is doomed to fail.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Civil procedure rules
Applicant must establish existence of points of law or fact for certification to Court of Appeal.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The application fails because no points of law or fact were established to warrant certification for appeal.
Court disposition
dismissed
- application dismissed with costs
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 4 September 1998
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 4 September 1998
.... _...,__ _ DAR ES Si'..::,.\..·-.l'•i DISTRICT REG:::.JTRY --;-, . . '-4T' · _.;1. ., : . .n- \. --'~ ~ ~ ;:;'-::: .:._.JJ,1. , .: L i ,-, 1'-'1 j :!.,rl. (FrDm Origirnl fWi 1 S Court F::i:SU _·,J Cj_viJ_ Case No.21/92)
SHANI AYURJ V.SRSU'.'3
RULING The applicant is t';e: .:.::.:.':2n,i;2nt j_r:;_ Civil Case i'Jo.70 of 1997 at the Court of Resident rv,agi::t:_~·::.t:.::, ~~is,,,tu. After he had called four ·1.':.-~n2232s iL (ii!', .:L_j:~'---'Lc.0 he filed a chamber a}-,Pl.ic::-~til· n praying i:L·,t the =~,:~':lceediri..gs be stnyed until Criruinal C·~:se Na.1089 :<: i-:~r:,6 :1t the application was ::;_i_sn.ised ;::ind o.n app:::J.1 against the order disr.1issing t~1Jt sppli.c,~rci,:-,n w:::is itself dismissed by this Cour-t, K:1123.::y:::, ? • This c:)U:;: t 0 i::_,_:,J_;-~ that the Crilliinal Case has LJ ::::.ir12c t rel.c've:.::1c2 -C') t'.:12 civil c 9 se whic·h, at any r9te, has r-e9.ched :::tL 3.,~v'.lnced st8.t,e. It is froIT: that decision ·that the a ::•r1L.c.:.::·.:.·~ ,3•2GEs leave to appeal to the Ccurt of Appeal. No•,1 r t::iis a1.=-1Jlicaticn relo:Ls second aj,)pea.1,. T,D 8. The appJ_ic,:,nL has to establish ·that there are points of lm, c: r -. U.x,::=:c-t l::nv and fact v,rhich will be certified to the >: ;_:rt of A.PPec,l. I-'Jy exan,i n:~ ti._; ::.1 ,:: :'.:' th-= 3.ffidavi t evidence supporti1.:.g th:.:: .:::.:~;-lic:-:tion ::';.s :.::_2111 c.::3 written ,, arguments contain no raore than his b-::~_L,i' -t.:.·:-_-'.; h,=:: has overwhealming ehances of succ2.:;s if tiij_:_:; ::1 __ ;.l_"'..·'.:=:. c~_on will succeed. the respondent, has pointe.-: out th::: iT.e:r:::: .:=:l:~ , --~.::...)n that this court cr:r-2d wn.0 :,:-: ' ; cannot be consicL,:-\.::'1 to o,.:.: law and fact. So that ti12 ~'l.PPlicatis n- n,ust fail as it is doomed to. ... 2 In the re$ult the application i~ dismissed with costs. Delivered. J ~ M. J.ViACr~i~NJA
JUDGE 4/9/98 In person: For Arplic3rrt Mr •. Ukwonga Advocate for Re sporn.10 nt. CGrtified true copy of the Origi::.,al.
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.