Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

20150720 TZHC Dar es Salaam

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The existence of a pending appeal and lack of opposition from respondents justified quashing and setting aside the lower court's decisions and orders.

Court disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Decisions and orders of Resident Magistrate's Court quashed and set aside
  • Application granted with costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Shirwa Company Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Mr. Mpwaga Bernard

Abu Abdulbazak

1st Respondent Counsel: Mr. Kambamwene (represented by Mr. Lusa Edwin)

Temeke Municipal Council

2nd Respondent Counsel: Ms. Kinyasi Jacqueline

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Civil Revision / Ruling

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the orders and decisions of the Resident Magistrate's Court should be revised and set aside due to pending appeal and alleged impropriety

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant sought revision of proceedings and orders of the Resident Magistrate's Court, citing pending appeal and alleged incorrectness, impropriety, and illegality.
Respondent
2nd Respondent did not oppose the application; 1st Respondent failed to file counter affidavit and did not appear for hearing.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 44(1)(b) of the Magistrates' Courts Act, Cap 11 RE 2002; Section 79(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 RE 2002

    Court may revise lower court proceedings and orders for correctness, propriety, and legality, especially where subject matter is pending before appellate court.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The existence of a pending appeal and lack of opposition from respondents justified quashing and setting aside the lower court's decisions and orders.

Court disposition

Application granted

  • Decisions and orders of Resident Magistrate's Court quashed and set aside
  • Application granted with costs

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 20 July 2015

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 20 July 2015

20150720 TZHC Dar es Salaam

- IN THE HIGH.COURT OF TANZANIA

AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL REVISION NO. 39 OF 2014 [Originating from the decision of Kisutu Resident Magistrate's Court in RM: Civil Case No. 407 of 1995 and 113/ 1996] SHIRWA COMPANY LTD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ... APPLICANT

VERSUS ,,..,. ABU ABDULBAZAK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l sT RESPONDENT TEMEKE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL . . . . . . . . . . 2N° RESPONDENT Date of last order - 15/7/2015 Date of Ruling - 20 /7/2015

RULING Feleshi, J.: The Applicant has invited this Court to revise the proceedings and orders in RI\/[ Civil Case No. 407 of 1995 and 113 of 1996 betv.reen the parties herein issued by Hon. I. Arufani, PRIVI on 27/11/2014 and also to satisfy itself as to their correctness, propriety, legality and 1nake any appropriate orders to correct the claimed incorrectness, i1npropriety and illegalities. The Application is made under S. 44 (1) (b) of the MCA, Cap 11 RE 2002 and 8.79 ( 1) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E.

2002. The Application ·was filed on 13/12/2014 and "wheri called on for hearing on 5/5/2015 none of the parties sho\ved up. The san1e · Page 1 of 4 r· was fixed for hearing on 22/6/2015. On that date Mr. Mp"V\raga Bernard Advocate appeared for the Applicant ·while the 2 nd Respondent, the Temeke Municipal Council was represented by Mr. Lusa Edv;,rin who also held Brief of Mr. Kambamwene Advocate for the 1 st Respondent. On that date, Mr. Lusa Ed,Nin informed the Court that upon senrice the counsel for the 1 st Respondent had instructed him to pray for leave for so that he could file his Counter Affidavit within 7 days. The prayer was granted and hearing was fixed on 15/7/2015. Very unfortunately, the 1st Respondent did not show up on 15/7/2015 ·1Nhile the Applicant an.d the 2 nd Respondent v;rere represented in Court by Mr. IVIp'Naga Bernard Advocate and I\,fs Kinyasi Jacqueline Advocate respectively. Until 15/7/2015 the 1st Respondent had not yet filed his Counter Affidavit though had on the san1e day of hearing served a letter to this Court in.fanning that he ,7'7as scheduled to appear before the Court of Appeal of Tanzania on the very day. The 2 nd Respondent did not object the Application. I have paid regard to the fact that the 2 nd Respondent does not oppose the Application and also that until the date fixed for hearing on 15/7/2015 the 1 st Respondent, ·who secured leave

of this Court to file his Counter Affidavit, had not done so. That in1.pliedly was also either his decision not to oppose the Application or to frustrate the other legal processes arranged on the same matter in as far as the Applicant and the 2 nd Respondent are concerned. I therefore decided to rule out on the Application without v.raiting for the 1st Page 2 of 4 r Respondent ,vho did not follovir the procedure set out for one to seek adjournment or leave of the Court for doing any act arising from the ongoing Court proceedings. The Affidavit s,\rorn in by Daniel Haule Ngudungi in support of the Application and the record as a whole have seized my attention. I found it factual that when the Resident Magistrate Court issued the complained of decisions and orders there were already in place the Civil Application No. 89 of 2014 which is pending for hearing in the Court of Appeal. Taking note of that fact and also that 'Nhat is complained against are decisions and orders of this Court ·whose subject matter require to be legally detennined by the legal process before the Court of Appeal, I grant the Application and quash and set aside the decisions and orders that have been issued in favour 20/7/2015 Coram: Dr. E.IVI. Feleshi, J. For the Applicant: l\!Ir. 1\/ipwaga Bernard, Adv. For the 1 st Respondent: }- For the 2 nd Respondent: Absent C.C.: Hadija Page 3 of 4 Mr. Mpwaga Bernard Adv.: My Lord, the matter is coming for Ruling. We are ready. Court: Ruling delivered Order: Application is granted 'th costs. \ i ( (/. i I / 20/7/2015 Page 4 of 4

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Magistrates' Courts Act, Cap 11 RE 2002, Section 44(1)(b)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 RE 2002, Section 79(1)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.