CIVIL APPLICATION NO 536 17 OF 2023 SILAHA WATISON VS
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to state the grounds for review in the notice of motion or supporting affidavit, and did not account for the period of delay. The alleged illegality was not properly pleaded and was raised only in submissions, making the application misconceived and incompetent.
- Citation
- CIVIL APPLICATION NO 536 17 OF 2023 SILAHA WATISON VS
- Parties
- Applicant: Silaha Watison; Respondent: Kulwa Nassoro
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Review, Land Dispute, Procedural Requirements
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Silaha Watison
Applicant
Kulwa Nassoro
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated good cause or illegality to warrant extension of time to file review
- 2 Whether the application complied with procedural requirements under the Court of Appeal Rules
Ratio Decidendi
The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to state the grounds for review in the notice of motion or supporting affidavit, and did not account for the period of delay. The alleged illegality was not properly pleaded and was raised only in submissions, making the application misconceived and incompetent.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment