silas katemi vs paul robertson mbwana another 2018 tzhclandd 524 3 august 2018

silas katemi vs paul robertson mbwana another 2018 tzhclandd 524 3 august 2018

The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay, specifically the delay in obtaining copies of the judgment and decree, and showed diligence in pursuing the appeal, justifying the grant of extension of time.

Citation
silas katemi vs paul robertson mbwana another 2018 tzhclandd 524 3 august 2018
Parties
Applicant: Silas Katemi; 1st Respondent: Paul Robertson Mbwana; 2nd Respondent: Camillius Mahindi
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
3 August 2018
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Sufficient Cause for Delay
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeal Procedure Sufficient Cause for Delay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Silas Katemi

Applicant

Paul Robertson Mbwana

1st Respondent

Camillius Mahindi

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file an appeal out of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant demonstrated sufficient cause for the delay, specifically the delay in obtaining copies of the judgment and decree, and showed diligence in pursuing the appeal, justifying the grant of extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Extension of time to file appeal out of time granted
  • Applicant to file appeal within fourteen (14) days from the date of the ruling