simon hamis sanga vs stephen mafimbo madway 2023 tzca 174 5 april 2023

simon hamis sanga vs stephen mafimbo madway 2023 tzca 174 5 april 2023

The application for revision was misconceived because the applicant failed to demonstrate that the High Court's order was not appealable or that there was any illegality, irregularity, or impropriety justifying revision. Revision cannot be used as an alternative to appeal.

Citation
simon hamis sanga vs stephen mafimbo madway 2023 tzca 174 5 april 2023
Parties
Applicant: Simon Hamis Sanga; 1st Respondent: Stephen Mafimbo Madwary; 2nd Respondent: Udugu Hamidu Umgeni
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
5 April 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision
Outcome
Application struck out with costs
Legal Topics
Revision Jurisdiction, Appealability of Orders, Estate Administration, Bona Fide Purchaser, Public Auction Vs Private Sale
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Succession Law Revision Jurisdiction Appealability of Orders Estate Administration Bona Fide Purchaser Public Auction Vs Private Sale

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simon Hamis Sanga

Applicant

Stephen Mafimbo Madwary

1st Respondent

Udugu Hamidu Umgeni

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application for Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court's order declaring the 1st respondent as rightful purchaser is appealable or revisable
  2. 2 Whether the applicant was wrongly dispossessed as a bona fide purchaser
  3. 3 Whether the sale of the property complied with court orders

Ratio Decidendi

The application for revision was misconceived because the applicant failed to demonstrate that the High Court's order was not appealable or that there was any illegality, irregularity, or impropriety justifying revision. Revision cannot be used as an alternative to appeal.

Court Disposition

Application struck out with costs

Orders

  • The application for revision is struck out with costs.