SIMON MBOJE VS HAMISI
The application is incompetent because it improperly joined parties (1st and 2nd respondents) who were not parties to the original suit, contrary to established legal principles.
- Citation
- SIMON MBOJE VS HAMISI
- Parties
- Applicant: Simon Mboje; 1st Respondent: Hamis Said @ Tshombe Abwao; 2nd Respondent: Malick Nassoro (administrator of the estate of the late Nassoro Gwama); 3rd Respondent: Ester Tirugenda (administrator of the estate of the late Gerald Tirugenda)
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application struck out as incompetent
- Legal Topics
- Joinder of Parties, Extension of Time, Competence of Application
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Simon Mboje
Applicant
Hamis Said @ Tshombe Abwao
1st Respondent
Malick Nassoro (administrator of the estate of the late Nassoro Gwama)
2nd Respondent
Ester Tirugenda (administrator of the estate of the late Gerald Tirugenda)
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application is incompetent for joining parties who were not parties to the original suit
- 2 Whether the application for extension of time is properly before the court
Ratio Decidendi
The application is incompetent because it improperly joined parties (1st and 2nd respondents) who were not parties to the original suit, contrary to established legal principles.
Court Disposition
Application struck out as incompetent
Orders
- Application struck out
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment