simphrosa paul mrema vs rose maiko mkupas and another 2021 tzhclandd 337 28 july 2021

simphrosa paul mrema vs rose maiko mkupas and another 2021 tzhclandd 337 28 july 2021

The court found that the alleged illegality in the tribunal's decision was sufficiently important to constitute good cause for extension of time, despite the applicant's failure to account for all days of delay due to illness.

Citation
simphrosa paul mrema vs rose maiko mkupas and another 2021 tzhclandd 337 28 july 2021
Parties
Applicant: Simphrosa Paul Mrema; 1st Respondent: Rose Maiko Mkupasi; 2nd Respondent: Joseph Paul Mrema
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
28 July 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Res Judicata, Objection Proceedings
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Simphrosa Paul Mrema

Applicant

Rose Maiko Mkupasi

1st Respondent

Joseph Paul Mrema

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file appeal
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegality in tribunal's decision justifies extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the alleged illegality in the tribunal's decision was sufficiently important to constitute good cause for extension of time, despite the applicant's failure to account for all days of delay due to illness.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant granted leave to lodge Notice of Appeal within twenty-one days from date of ruling