sinani building contractors limited others vs crdb 2024 tzca 196 19 march 2024
Charged properties that are the subject of the decree and no longer in the hands of the applicants cannot serve as security for due performance of the decree. Applicants must provide a different form of security, specifically a bank guarantee for the decretal sum, to obtain a stay of execution.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- sinani building contractors limited others vs crdb 2024 tzca 196 19 march 2024
- Parties
- Applicant: Sinani Building Contractors Limited; Applicant: Mohamed Said Sinani; Applicant: Asma Mohamed Sinani; Respondent: CRDB Bank PLC
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 March 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application for stay of execution granted with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Security for Due Performance, Charged Property as Security, Bank Guarantee
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sinani Building Contractors Limited
Applicant
Mohamed Said Sinani
Applicant
Asma Mohamed Sinani
Applicant
CRDB Bank PLC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether charged property can constitute security for due performance of decree in stay of execution applications
- 2 What form of security is appropriate for stay of execution pending appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Charged properties that are the subject of the decree and no longer in the hands of the applicants cannot serve as security for due performance of the decree. Applicants must provide a different form of security, specifically a bank guarantee for the decretal sum, to obtain a stay of execution.
Court Disposition
application for stay of execution granted with conditions
Orders
- Stay of execution granted on condition that applicants provide a bank guarantee for the decretal sum of TZS 283,218,845.65 within sixty days from the date of the ruling.
- Applicants are restrained from dissipating the value of the bank guarantee during the pendency of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment