SINANI REVIEW JUDGEMENT

SINANI REVIEW JUDGEMENT

The grounds of appeal cited by the applicant were not pure points of law but required factual determination; the court had addressed the substantive issue of land ownership on the merits, and no error apparent on the face of the record was demonstrated. Review is not a substitute for appeal, and the applicant failed to meet the threshold for review under the Civil Procedure Code.

Citation
SINANI REVIEW JUDGEMENT
Parties
Applicant: Sinani Hussein; Respondent: Nazifa Ibrahim
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 1997
Procedural Posture
Land Case Review / Judgment on Review Application
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Review of Judgment, Jurisdiction, Locus Standi, Land Ownership, Appellate Procedure
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sinani Hussein

Applicant

Nazifa Ibrahim

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Case Review / Judgment on Review Application

  1. 1 Whether the court failed to consider grounds of appeal raising points of law, particularly jurisdiction and locus standi
  2. 2 Whether there was an error apparent on the face of the record justifying review

Ratio Decidendi

The grounds of appeal cited by the applicant were not pure points of law but required factual determination; the court had addressed the substantive issue of land ownership on the merits, and no error apparent on the face of the record was demonstrated. Review is not a substitute for appeal, and the applicant failed to meet the threshold for review under the Civil Procedure Code.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for review dismissed with no order as to costs