ruling sinohydro

ruling sinohydro

The applicant accounted for each day of delay, and the delay was technical due to procedural error; extension of time is justified.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
ruling sinohydro
Parties
Applicant: Sinohydro Corporation Limited; Respondent: Obal Services Company Limited
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
18 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal, Technical Delay
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeal Technical Delay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sinohydro Corporation Limited

Applicant

Obal Services Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has sufficiently accounted for the delay to warrant extension of time to appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant accounted for each day of delay, and the delay was technical due to procedural error; extension of time is justified.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Applicant is availed with 30 days from the date of this ruling within which to lodge intended appeal.
  • No order as to costs.