siri sangiwa vs abdallah a abdallah 2021 tzhclandd 779 29 october 2021
The tribunal committed a fundamental procedural error by raising and deciding the issue of locus standi suo motu without affording the parties the right to be heard, resulting in a miscarriage of justice and rendering the decision a nullity.
- Citation
- siri sangiwa vs abdallah a abdallah 2021 tzhclandd 779 29 october 2021
- Parties
- Appellant: Siri Sangiwa; 1st Respondent: Abdalla Ahmed Abdallah; 2nd Respondent: Mrs. Tahaya Ahmed Abdalla
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment on First Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Locus Standi, Right to Be Heard, Matrimonial Property, Ownership of Land, Procedural Fairness
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Siri Sangiwa
Appellant
Abdalla Ahmed Abdallah
1st Respondent
Mrs. Tahaya Ahmed Abdalla
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment on First Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tribunal erred by raising locus standi suo motu without hearing parties
- 2 Whether the tribunal failed to consider evidence of ownership and matrimonial property
- 3 Whether the tribunal failed to properly evaluate evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal committed a fundamental procedural error by raising and deciding the issue of locus standi suo motu without affording the parties the right to be heard, resulting in a miscarriage of justice and rendering the decision a nullity.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Judgment of the District Land and Housing Tribunal for Temeke in Land Application No. 42 of 2016 quashed
- File remitted to the District Land and Housing Tribunal for Temeke for proceedings before a different Chairman and composition of a new judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment