siri sangiwa vs abdallah a abdallah 2021 tzhclandd 779 29 october 2021

siri sangiwa vs abdallah a abdallah 2021 tzhclandd 779 29 october 2021

The tribunal committed a fundamental procedural error by raising and deciding the issue of locus standi suo motu without affording the parties the right to be heard, resulting in a miscarriage of justice and rendering the decision a nullity.

Citation
siri sangiwa vs abdallah a abdallah 2021 tzhclandd 779 29 october 2021
Parties
Appellant: Siri Sangiwa; 1st Respondent: Abdalla Ahmed Abdallah; 2nd Respondent: Mrs. Tahaya Ahmed Abdalla
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
29 October 2021
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment on First Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Locus Standi, Right to Be Heard, Matrimonial Property, Ownership of Land, Procedural Fairness
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Siri Sangiwa

Appellant

Abdalla Ahmed Abdallah

1st Respondent

Mrs. Tahaya Ahmed Abdalla

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Appeal / Judgment on First Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the tribunal erred by raising locus standi suo motu without hearing parties
  2. 2 Whether the tribunal failed to consider evidence of ownership and matrimonial property
  3. 3 Whether the tribunal failed to properly evaluate evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal committed a fundamental procedural error by raising and deciding the issue of locus standi suo motu without affording the parties the right to be heard, resulting in a miscarriage of justice and rendering the decision a nullity.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Judgment of the District Land and Housing Tribunal for Temeke in Land Application No. 42 of 2016 quashed
  • File remitted to the District Land and Housing Tribunal for Temeke for proceedings before a different Chairman and composition of a new judgment