skywords construction company limited vs eco bank tanzania limited and 5 others 2021 tzhccomd 3389 29 october 2021
The applicant failed to prove any legally recognized or registered interest in the disputed property at the time of attachment, nor was the applicant in possession. The applicant's contractual claim was inferior to the 1st respondent's registered mortgage, and the contract relied upon was not registered as required by law. Therefore, the applicant's objection proceedings could not succeed, and the application was dismissed.
- Citation
- skywords construction company limited vs eco bank tanzania limited and 5 others 2021 tzhccomd 3389 29 october 2021
- Parties
- Applicant: Skywards Construction Company Limited; 1st Respondent: Ecobank Tanzania Limited; 2nd Respondent: Benbros Motor's Limited; 3rd Respondent: Yasser Mohamed Es-Haq; 4th Respondent: Noufal Mohamed Es-Haq; 5th Respondent: Yusra Mohamed Abdullah Es-Haq; 6th Respondent: Noel Estate Company Limited
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Objection Proceedings and Application for Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Objection Proceedings, Execution of Decree, Priority of Registered Interests, Attachment and Sale of Property, Land Registration
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Skywards Construction Company Limited
Applicant
Ecobank Tanzania Limited
1st Respondent
Benbros Motor's Limited
2nd Respondent
Yasser Mohamed Es-Haq
3rd Respondent
Noufal Mohamed Es-Haq
4th Respondent
Yusra Mohamed Abdullah Es-Haq
5th Respondent
Noel Estate Company Limited
6th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Objection Proceedings and Application for Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has a legally recognized interest in the attached property sufficient to warrant release from attachment and sale
- 2 Whether the applicant was in possession or had interest at the time of attachment as required by law
- 3 Whether the applicant's unregistered contractual claim can override a registered mortgagee's interest
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to prove any legally recognized or registered interest in the disputed property at the time of attachment, nor was the applicant in possession. The applicant's contractual claim was inferior to the 1st respondent's registered mortgage, and the contract relied upon was not registered as required by law. Therefore, the applicant's objection proceedings could not succeed, and the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment