sofia mkoto vs mwanahamisi ally 2006 tzhc 290 24 november 2006

sofia mkoto vs mwanahamisi ally 2006 tzhc 290 24 november 2006

The appellant failed to prove adultery to the required standard as there was no direct or sufficient credible circumstantial evidence, and the only supporting witness was interested and uncorroborated. The damages awarded by the Primary Court were speculative and unsupported by evidence or reference to custom.

Citation
sofia mkoto vs mwanahamisi ally 2006 tzhc 290 24 november 2006
Parties
Appellant: Sofia Mkoto; Respondent: Mwanahamisi Ally
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
24 November 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Adultery, Damages, Standard of Proof, Appeals
Source Language
English
Family Law Civil Procedure Adultery Damages Standard of Proof Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sofia Mkoto

Appellant

Mwanahamisi Ally

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant proved adultery to the required standard
  2. 2 Whether damages for adultery were properly awarded by the Primary Court

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to prove adultery to the required standard as there was no direct or sufficient credible circumstantial evidence, and the only supporting witness was interested and uncorroborated. The damages awarded by the Primary Court were speculative and unsupported by evidence or reference to custom.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Decision of the District Court affirmed
  • Appeal dismissed with costs