somochem limited vs super sip limited 2023 tzhccomd 306 8 september 2023
The plaintiff failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that the defendant was indebted in the claimed amount, as key invoices and delivery notes were unstamped and not corroborated by other evidence. The court found no breach of agreement and no outstanding liability by the defendant.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- somochem limited vs super sip limited 2023 tzhccomd 306 8 september 2023
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Somochem Limited; Defendant: Super Sip Limited
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 8 September 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Suit dismissed with costs to the defendant.
- Legal Topics
- Supply of Goods, Breach of Contract, Burden of Proof, Evidence in Commercial Disputes
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Somochem Limited
Plaintiff
Super Sip Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff supplied the agreed amount of chemical compounds to the defendant as ordered and if not whether there was breach of the agreement between two parties
- 2 Whether the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff and to what extent
- 3 To what reliefs are parties entitled
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff failed to prove on a balance of probabilities that the defendant was indebted in the claimed amount, as key invoices and delivery notes were unstamped and not corroborated by other evidence. The court found no breach of agreement and no outstanding liability by the defendant.
Court Disposition
Suit dismissed with costs to the defendant.
Orders
- The suit is dismissed with costs to the defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment