stadius ndibalema vs hssan ramadhani 2023 tzhclandd 16407 24 april 2023

stadius ndibalema vs hssan ramadhani 2023 tzhclandd 16407 24 april 2023

The statutory period for filing an appeal had not lapsed as only 11 days elapsed from the date the judgment was certified to the date the application was lodged. The applicant demonstrated sufficient grounds for extension of time.

Citation
stadius ndibalema vs hssan ramadhani 2023 tzhclandd 16407 24 april 2023
Parties
Applicant: Stadius Ndibalema; Respondent: Hassani Ramadhani
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
24 April 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Limitation Period
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Limitation Period

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stadius Ndibalema

Applicant

Hassani Ramadhani

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has advanced sufficient grounds for extension of time to file an appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The statutory period for filing an appeal had not lapsed as only 11 days elapsed from the date the judgment was certified to the date the application was lodged. The applicant demonstrated sufficient grounds for extension of time.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Applicant allowed to file an appeal within 45 days from the date of the ruling
  • No order as to costs