stanslaus bikanga vs iddi seleman and another 2020 tzhc 286 31 march 2020

stanslaus bikanga vs iddi seleman and another 2020 tzhc 286 31 march 2020

The application was filed under the wrong provision of law, rendering it incompetent before the court.

Citation
stanslaus bikanga vs iddi seleman and another 2020 tzhc 286 31 march 2020
Parties
Applicant: Stanslaus Bikanga; 1st Respondent: Iddi Seleman; 2nd Respondent: Antonini Rutalindwa
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
31 March 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application struck out as incompetent.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Jurisdiction, Limitation of Actions
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Appeals Jurisdiction Limitation of Actions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stanslaus Bikanga

Applicant

Iddi Seleman

1st Respondent

Antonini Rutalindwa

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for extension of time was brought under the correct legal provision
  2. 2 Whether the application is competent given inclusion of a deceased respondent

Ratio Decidendi

The application was filed under the wrong provision of law, rendering it incompetent before the court.

Court Disposition

Application struck out as incompetent.

Orders

  • Application for extension of time to appeal out of time is struck out.
  • No order as to costs.