kasulu town council vs ibrahim ntagalugwa and 18 others 2022 tzhc 15042 11 november 2022

kasulu town council vs ibrahim ntagalugwa and 18 others 2022 tzhc 15042 11 november 2022

Absence of any pending appeal, revision, or review means there is no sufficient cause to grant a stay of execution under Order XXI Rule 24(1) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Citation
kasulu town council vs ibrahim ntagalugwa and 18 others 2022 tzhc 15042 11 november 2022
Parties
Applicant / Judgment Debtor: Kasulu Town Council; Respondent / Decree Holder: Ibrahim Ntagalugwa; Respondent / Decree Holder: Daniel Mpulila; Respondent / Decree Holder: Justine Kayoyo; Respondent / Decree Holder: Deogratius Dodwe; Respondent / Decree Holder: Noah Gervas; Respondent / Decree Holder: Asha Alex; Respondent / Decree Holder: Fenias Wilson; Respondent / Decree Holder: Selema Bilohe; Respondent / Decree Holder: Magwila Pius; Respondent / Decree Holder: Habiba Athuman; Respondent / Decree Holder: John Memba; Respondent / Decree Holder: Mathias Kajinyika; Respondent / Decree Holder: Kilolo Salum Ally; Respondent / Decree Holder: Haruna Nako; Respondent / Decree Holder: Gidion Yakobo; Respondent / Decree Holder: Salehe Toyi; Respondent / Decree Holder: Jerome Mbumbuli; Respondent / Decree Holder: Pius Katulumula; Respondent / Decree Holder: Herbert Gwitaba
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
11 November 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Execution of Decree
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Execution of Decree

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kasulu Town Council

Applicant / Judgment Debtor

Ibrahim Ntagalugwa

Respondent / Decree Holder

Daniel Mpulila

Respondent / Decree Holder

Justine Kayoyo

Respondent / Decree Holder

Deogratius Dodwe

Respondent / Decree Holder

Noah Gervas

Respondent / Decree Holder

Asha Alex

Respondent / Decree Holder

Fenias Wilson

Respondent / Decree Holder

Selema Bilohe

Respondent / Decree Holder

Magwila Pius

Respondent / Decree Holder

Habiba Athuman

Respondent / Decree Holder

John Memba

Respondent / Decree Holder

Mathias Kajinyika

Respondent / Decree Holder

Kilolo Salum Ally

Respondent / Decree Holder

Haruna Nako

Respondent / Decree Holder

Gidion Yakobo

Respondent / Decree Holder

Salehe Toyi

Respondent / Decree Holder

Jerome Mbumbuli

Respondent / Decree Holder

Pius Katulumula

Respondent / Decree Holder

Herbert Gwitaba

Respondent / Decree Holder

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sufficient cause was shown to warrant stay of execution of the decree

Ratio Decidendi

Absence of any pending appeal, revision, or review means there is no sufficient cause to grant a stay of execution under Order XXI Rule 24(1) of the Civil Procedure Code.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for stay of execution is dismissed with no order as to costs