christopher ritte vs shivacom t ltd 2012 tzhccomd 36 31 july 2012
The application is incompetent for citing the wrong provisions of law (Order XXI Rules 24(1), 27, and section 95 CPC), as the correct provision is Rule 11(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009. The High Court retains jurisdiction to grant stay of execution where only a notice of appeal has been lodged, but the application must be properly grounded in law.
- Citation
- christopher ritte vs shivacom t ltd 2012 tzhccomd 36 31 july 2012
- Parties
- Applicant/judgment Debtor: Christopher Ritte t/a DGS Agency; Respondent/decree Holder: Shivacom Tanzania Limited
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Stay of Execution / Ruling on Application for Stay Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- application struck out with costs
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Appeals, Jurisdiction, Application of Procedural Rules
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Ritte t/a DGS Agency
Applicant/judgment Debtor
Shivacom Tanzania Limited
Respondent/decree Holder
Procedural Posture
Application for Stay of Execution / Ruling on Application for Stay Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for stay of execution was made under the correct legal provisions
- 2 Whether the High Court or the Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to grant stay of execution when only a notice of appeal has been lodged
Ratio Decidendi
The application is incompetent for citing the wrong provisions of law (Order XXI Rules 24(1), 27, and section 95 CPC), as the correct provision is Rule 11(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules, 2009. The High Court retains jurisdiction to grant stay of execution where only a notice of appeal has been lodged, but the application must be properly grounded in law.
Court Disposition
application struck out with costs
Orders
- The application for stay of execution is struck out for citing wrong provisions of law.
- Costs awarded to the respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment