20070803 TZHC Moshi

20070803 TZHC Moshi

The application was struck out because it was brought under the wrong provisions of law, namely Section 14 of the Law of Limitation Act, 1971 and Section 95 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1966, instead of the specific provision, Section 11(1) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act.

Citation
20070803 TZHC Moshi
Parties
Applicant: Stephen Albert Kessy; Respondent: The Registered Trustees Moshi Diocese; Respondent: August Nyange; Respondent: Severine Ndelianarua; Respondent: Alphonce Marealle; Respondent: Erasmus M. Cha
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
3 August 2007
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application struck out
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Jurisdiction, Procedural Law
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen Albert Kessy

Applicant

The Registered Trustees Moshi Diocese

Respondent

August Nyange

Respondent

Severine Ndelianarua

Respondent

Alphonce Marealle

Respondent

Erasmus M. Cha

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the application for extension of time is properly before the court when brought under Section 14 of the Law of Limitation Act, 1971 and Section 95 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1966 instead of Section 11(1) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act

Ratio Decidendi

The application was struck out because it was brought under the wrong provisions of law, namely Section 14 of the Law of Limitation Act, 1971 and Section 95 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1966, instead of the specific provision, Section 11(1) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act.

Court Disposition

Application struck out

Orders

  • Application struck out for being brought under wrong provisions of law
  • No order as to costs