sudi ramadhani mbegu chitagoni vs republic 2015 tzca 353 21 july 2015

sudi ramadhani mbegu chitagoni vs republic 2015 tzca 353 21 july 2015

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to show that the intended review was based on any of the grounds listed under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, which is a mandatory requirement.

Citation
sudi ramadhani mbegu chitagoni vs republic 2015 tzca 353 21 july 2015
Parties
Applicant: Sudi Ramadhani Mbegu @ Chitagoni; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
21 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Review
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Court of Appeal Rules
Source Language
English
Criminal Law Appellate Procedure Extension of Time Review of Judgment Court of Appeal Rules

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sudi Ramadhani Mbegu @ Chitagoni

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Apply for Review

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to apply for review under Rule 10 of the Court of Appeal Rules 2007
  2. 2 Whether the application is predicated upon one or more grounds of review listed under Rule 66(1) of the Rules

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the applicant failed to show that the intended review was based on any of the grounds listed under Rule 66(1) of the Court of Appeal Rules, which is a mandatory requirement.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application for extension of time is dismissed.