sudi said seif vs kinondoni municipal council 2 others 2021 tzhclandd 6875 23 november 2021

sudi said seif vs kinondoni municipal council 2 others 2021 tzhclandd 6875 23 november 2021

Applicant failed to provide evidence of sickness and did not account for each day of delay; alleged illegality is not a valid ground for review under the enabling provisions; application lacks merit.

Citation
sudi said seif vs kinondoni municipal council 2 others 2021 tzhclandd 6875 23 november 2021
Parties
Applicant: Sudi Said Seif; 1st Respondent: Kinondoni Municipal Council; 2nd Respondent: Mohamed Hashim Mkweche; 3rd Respondent: Commissioner for Lands and Human Settlement
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
23 November 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review, Sufficient Cause, Accounting for Delay
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Review Sufficient Cause Accounting for Delay

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sudi Said Seif

Applicant

Kinondoni Municipal Council

1st Respondent

Mohamed Hashim Mkweche

2nd Respondent

Commissioner for Lands and Human Settlement

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has provided sufficient cause for extension of time to apply for review
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has accounted for each day of delay
  3. 3 Whether alleged illegality in the impugned judgment constitutes a valid ground for review

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to provide evidence of sickness and did not account for each day of delay; alleged illegality is not a valid ground for review under the enabling provisions; application lacks merit.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • no order as to costs