ms association of kilimanjaro speciality coffee growes limited others vs exim bank tanzania limited 2015 tzhccomd 2102 5 may 2015
Plaintiff failed to provide detailed particulars and breakdown of the claim, and defendants raised triable issues regarding the amount and liability. Therefore, unconditional leave to defend must be granted.
- Citation
- ms association of kilimanjaro speciality coffee growes limited others vs exim bank tanzania limited 2015 tzhccomd 2102 5 may 2015
- Parties
- Applicant/defendant: M/S Association of Kilimanjaro Speciality Coffee Growers Limited; Applicant/defendant: Philemon Haule; Applicant/defendant: Blanka Ndunguru; Applicant/defendant: William Shao; Applicant/defendant: Asajile Kayange; Applicant/defendant: Emiline Swai; Applicant/defendant: Adriano Mwalusambo; Applicant/defendant: Godfrey Mwangulumbe; Respondent/plaintiff: Exim Bank (Tanzania) Limited
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Commercial Application/cause / Ruling on Application for Unconditional Leave to Defend
- Outcome
- unconditional leave to defend granted
- Legal Topics
- Summary Procedure, Loan Recovery, Guarantee Liability, Leave to Defend
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M/S Association of Kilimanjaro Speciality Coffee Growers Limited
Applicant/defendant
Philemon Haule
Applicant/defendant
Blanka Ndunguru
Applicant/defendant
William Shao
Applicant/defendant
Asajile Kayange
Applicant/defendant
Emiline Swai
Applicant/defendant
Adriano Mwalusambo
Applicant/defendant
Godfrey Mwangulumbe
Applicant/defendant
Exim Bank (Tanzania) Limited
Respondent/plaintiff
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Commercial Application/cause / Ruling on Application for Unconditional Leave to Defend
Legal Issues
- 1 whether defendants are entitled to unconditional leave to defend the summary suit
- 2 whether plaintiff provided sufficient particulars of claim
- 3 liability of guarantors when part of debt is guaranteed by third party
Ratio Decidendi
Plaintiff failed to provide detailed particulars and breakdown of the claim, and defendants raised triable issues regarding the amount and liability. Therefore, unconditional leave to defend must be granted.
Court Disposition
unconditional leave to defend granted
Orders
- Defendants to file written statement of defense within 21 days
- Plaintiff to file reply within two weeks thereafter
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment