suna mwinyimkuu vs mohamed seleman 2016 tzca 932 13 december 2016

suna mwinyimkuu vs mohamed seleman 2016 tzca 932 13 december 2016

There is no time limit for amending the Memorandum of Appeal under Rule 111, so an application for extension of time is misconceived and unnecessary.

Citation
suna mwinyimkuu vs mohamed seleman 2016 tzca 932 13 december 2016
Parties
Applicant: Suna Mwinyimkuu; Respondent: Mohamed Seleman
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
13 December 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application struck out
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Amendment of Memorandum of Appeal
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Amendment of Memorandum of Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Suna Mwinyimkuu

Applicant

Mohamed Seleman

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for extension of time to amend the Memorandum of Appeal is properly before the Court

Ratio Decidendi

There is no time limit for amending the Memorandum of Appeal under Rule 111, so an application for extension of time is misconceived and unnecessary.

Court Disposition

Application struck out

Orders

  • Application struck out with no order as to costs