swedi mohamed vs jackson range 2020 tzhclandd 53 27 february 2020
Failure to cite the specific subsection of Section 11 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act is a fatal omission that renders the application incompetent and warrants striking out the application.
- Citation
- swedi mohamed vs jackson range 2020 tzhclandd 53 27 february 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: Swedi Mohamed; Respondent: Jackson Range
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Application struck out with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Proper Citation of Law, Preliminary Objection, Competence of Application
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Parties
Swedi Mohamed
Applicant
Jackson Range
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether failure to cite the specific subsection of Section 11 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act renders the application incompetent
Ratio Decidendi
Failure to cite the specific subsection of Section 11 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act is a fatal omission that renders the application incompetent and warrants striking out the application.
Court Disposition
Application struck out with costs
Orders
- Application struck out with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment