19960216 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The appellant was neither the owner nor the tenant of the respondent, so the protection of section 25(1)(i) does not apply. The restoration of the respondent's application was not in accordance with the mandatory thirty-day period under Regulation 6(2), and the Tribunal erred in treating this as a curable error.
- Citation
- 19960216 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Tabia Mzee; Respondent: Aslam Khan
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal partly allowed
- Legal Topics
- Tenancy Termination, Restoration of Dismissed Applications, Compliance With Statutory Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tabia Mzee
Appellant
Aslam Khan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the requirements of section 25(1)(i) of the Rent Restriction Act, 1984 were complied with by the Regional Housing Tribunal
- 2 Whether failure to comply with Regulations 5 and 6 of the Regional Housing Tribunal Regulations, 1990 was a curable error
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was neither the owner nor the tenant of the respondent, so the protection of section 25(1)(i) does not apply. The restoration of the respondent's application was not in accordance with the mandatory thirty-day period under Regulation 6(2), and the Tribunal erred in treating this as a curable error.
Court Disposition
appeal partly allowed
Orders
- Appeal succeeds on the ground of procedural non-compliance regarding restoration of application.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment