tadeo teketela vs jetruda sonta 2023 tzhc 17767 5 june 2023

tadeo teketela vs jetruda sonta 2023 tzhc 17767 5 june 2023

The respondent proved ownership of the disputed land on the balance of probabilities, and the appellant failed to establish adverse possession or any fatal procedural irregularity. The evidence showed the respondent and her late husband lawfully purchased and occupied the land, and the tribunal's composition and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
tadeo teketela vs jetruda sonta 2023 tzhc 17767 5 june 2023
Parties
Appellant: Tadeo Teketela; Respondent: Jetruda Sonta
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
5 June 2023
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Ownership Dispute, Joinder of Parties, Evidence Evaluation, Ward Tribunal Procedure
Source Language
english
Land Law Adverse Possession Ownership Dispute Joinder of Parties Evidence Evaluation Ward Tribunal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tadeo Teketela

Appellant

Jetruda Sonta

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)

  1. 1 Whether the appellant acquired ownership of the disputed land by adverse possession
  2. 2 Whether the respondent proved ownership of the disputed land on the balance of probabilities
  3. 3 Whether non-joinder of the seller was fatal to the proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent proved ownership of the disputed land on the balance of probabilities, and the appellant failed to establish adverse possession or any fatal procedural irregularity. The evidence showed the respondent and her late husband lawfully purchased and occupied the land, and the tribunal's composition and procedure were proper.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No order as to costs