AR 133 of 20062

AR 133 of 20062

The suit was time-barred as it was filed almost twelve years after the cause of action arose, exceeding the six-year limitation period for contract claims, and the court had no authority to extend limitation for filing suits.

Citation
AR 133 of 20062
Parties
Appellant: Tanga Cement Co. Ltd.; Respondent: Christopherson Co. Ltd.
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2006
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Limitation of Actions, Breach of Contract, Extension of Time
Source Language
English
Contract Law Civil Procedure Limitation of Actions Breach of Contract Extension of Time

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tanga Cement Co. Ltd.

Appellant

Christopherson Co. Ltd.

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the suit for breach of contract was time-barred under the Limitation Act, 1971
  2. 2 Whether the court had authority to extend limitation for filing suits

Ratio Decidendi

The suit was time-barred as it was filed almost twelve years after the cause of action arose, exceeding the six-year limitation period for contract claims, and the court had no authority to extend limitation for filing suits.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Suit dismissed as time-barred
  • Appellant awarded costs