tansino quarries ltd another vs advent construction ltd another 2022 tzhccomd 311 30 september 2022
The Plaintiffs established, on a preponderance of probabilities, that the Defendant owed Tshs. 113,302,500/= for supplied aggregates and transport services under an implied contract, and that no valid cash payments were made to the 3rd party on behalf of the Plaintiffs. The Defendant's partial payments and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- tansino quarries ltd another vs advent construction ltd another 2022 tzhccomd 311 30 september 2022
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Tansino Quarries Limited; Plaintiff: XYZ Transport Limited; Defendant: Advent Construction Limited; Third Party: Xinxin Qiu alias Radha Qiu
- Court
- TZHCCOMD
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Implied Contracts, Outstanding Payments, Commercial Transactions, Burden of Proof, Interest on Debts
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tansino Quarries Limited
Plaintiff
XYZ Transport Limited
Plaintiff
Advent Construction Limited
Defendant
Xinxin Qiu alias Radha Qiu
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What was the contract sum agreed by the parties?
- 2 Whether the Plaintiffs are entitled to the balance of Tshs. 113,302,500/- claimed?
- 3 Whether the 3rd party received the claimed amount in relation to the transaction and if so, whether it was received on behalf of the Plaintiffs?
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiffs established, on a preponderance of probabilities, that the Defendant owed Tshs. 113,302,500/= for supplied aggregates and transport services under an implied contract, and that no valid cash payments were made to the 3rd party on behalf of the Plaintiffs. The Defendant's partial payments and the dishonored cheque were insufficient to discharge the debt. The Plaintiffs are entitled to the outstanding sum, interest as claimed, and costs, but not to general damages due to lack of evidence.
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiffs
Orders
- Defendant to pay Tshs. 113,300,500/= (Tshs. 16,572,500 to the 1st Plaintiff for aggregates and Tshs. 96,730,000 to the 2nd Plaintiff for transport services)
- Defendant to pay interest at 15% per month on the specific amounts from 24th August 2020 to the date of judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment