Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

tanzania cigarette company ltd vs anna mapunda andrew sabaya 2022 tzhcld 740 15 august 2022

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

In the absence of the CMA record and inability of both parties to reconstruct it, the Court cannot determine the revision application and must nullify the proceedings and award, ordering a retrial before another arbitrator.

Court disposition

CMA proceedings and award nullified; trial de novo ordered

Orders

  • CMA proceedings are nullified
  • Award is quashed and set aside
  • Parties to return to CMA for dispute to be heard before another arbitrator without delay

02

Material facts

Parties

Tanzania Cigarette Company Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Mr. Pascal Kamala

Anna Mapundi

1st Respondent Counsel: Patricia Mbosa

Andrew Sabaya

2nd Respondent Counsel: Patricia Mbosa

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Labour Revision Application / Ruling on Inability to Reconstruct Record; Application for Nullification and Trial De Novo

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant is unable to reconstruct the CMA record as the matter was handled by another advocate; prayed for nullification of CMA proceedings, quashing of the award, and order for trial de novo.
Respondent
Respondent is also unable to reconstruct the record; concurred with applicant's prayer for nullification and trial de novo.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court's inherent powers; procedural fairness

    Where the record of proceedings is unavailable and cannot be reconstructed, the proceedings and award must be nullified and a retrial ordered.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

In the absence of the CMA record and inability of both parties to reconstruct it, the Court cannot determine the revision application and must nullify the proceedings and award, ordering a retrial before another arbitrator.

Court disposition

CMA proceedings and award nullified; trial de novo ordered

  • CMA proceedings are nullified
  • Award is quashed and set aside
  • Parties to return to CMA for dispute to be heard before another arbitrator without delay

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 15 August 2022

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 15 August 2022

tanzania cigarette company ltd vs anna mapunda andrew sabaya 2022 tzhcld 740 15 august 2022

IN THE HIGH COUR OF TANZANIA

LABOUR DIVISION

AT PAR ES SALAAM REVISION APPLICATION NO. 304 OF 2021

BETWEEN TANZANIA CIGARETTE COMPANY LTD............................... APPLICANT AND ANNA MAPUNDI....................................................... 1st RESPONDENT ANDREW SABAYA..................................................... 2nd RESPONDENT

RULING Date of Ruting: 15/08/2022 B. E. K. MGANGA, J On 5th August 2021, Tanzania Cigarette Company Ltd, the herein applicant filed this application seeking the Court to revise CMA award issued on 10th June, 2016 in favor of Anna Mapundi and Andrew Sabaya, the herein respondents. When the matter was called on for hearing, the Court notified the parties that efforts to trace the CMA record has proved failure. The Court therefore asked the parties whether they are in a position to reconstruct the record and the way forward. On his part, Mr. Pascal Kamala Advocate for the applicant submitted that he is not in a position to reconstruct the CMA record, considering that i the matter was handled by another advocate who is currently not present. He therefore prayed that CMA proceedings be nullified, the award arising therefrom be quashed and set aside and order trial de novo. On her side, Patricia Mbosa, Advocate for the respondent concurred with submissions made by counsel for the applicant that she is also not in a position to reconstruct the record and prayed proceedings be nullified and order trial de novo. I entirely agree with both learned counsels that since there is no CMA record and parties are not in a position of reconstructing it, in no way this Court can determine this revision application. The only option available is to nullify the CMA proceedings, quash and set aside the award arising therefrom as I hereby do and order that parties should go back to CMA for the dispute to be heard before another arbitrator without delay. It is so ordered. 2

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.