tanzania harbours authority vs mathew mtalakule and 8 others 2002 tzca 18 4 april 2002
A default judgment cannot be entered under Order VIIIA Rule 5 when a party's advocate is present at mediation; the judge exceeded his powers in entering such a judgment.
- Citation
- tanzania harbours authority vs mathew mtalakule and 8 others 2002 tzca 18 4 april 2002
- Parties
- Appellant: Tanzania Harbours Authority; Respondents: Mathew Mtalakule & 8 Others
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 4 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment After ADR Mediation Proceedings
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Default Judgment, Mediation, Authority of Advocates, Court Powers Under Mediation Rules
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Tanzania Harbours Authority
Appellant
Mathew Mtalakule & 8 Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment After ADR Mediation Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a default judgment can be entered when a party's advocate is present at mediation
- 2 Whether the judge had legal authority to enter default judgment under Order VIIIA Rule 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules
Ratio Decidendi
A default judgment cannot be entered under Order VIIIA Rule 5 when a party's advocate is present at mediation; the judge exceeded his powers in entering such a judgment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Default judgment of 15th June, 1999 quashed
- Matter to be placed before another judge for hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment