tanzania motor services ltd vs tantrack agencies ltd 2005 tzca 22 12 may 200
Execution is not complete until the sale proceeds are paid to the decree holder; the court can stay the remaining execution process if irreparable loss and balance of convenience favor the applicant. The applicant demonstrated risk of irreparable loss and balance of convenience is in its favor, justifying grant of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- tanzania motor services ltd vs tantrack agencies ltd 2005 tzca 22 12 may 200
- Parties
- Applicant: Tanzania Motor Services Ltd.; Respondent: Tantrack Agencies Ltd.
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application for Stay of Execution / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for stay of execution granted with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Irreparable Loss, Balance of Convenience, Execution of Decree
- Source Language
- english
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tanzania Motor Services Ltd.
Applicant
Tantrack Agencies Ltd.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Stay of Execution / Ruling on Application for Stay of Execution Pending Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for stay of execution is overtaken by events due to partial execution
- 2 Whether the applicant will suffer irreparable loss if stay is not granted
- 3 Whether balance of convenience favors granting stay
Ratio Decidendi
Execution is not complete until the sale proceeds are paid to the decree holder; the court can stay the remaining execution process if irreparable loss and balance of convenience favor the applicant. The applicant demonstrated risk of irreparable loss and balance of convenience is in its favor, justifying grant of stay.
Court Disposition
Application for stay of execution granted with costs.
Orders
- Stay of execution granted pending hearing and determination of the intended appeal.
- Applicant is prohibited from selling, altering, changing, transferring, pledging, mortgaging, destroying, damaging, or otherwise dealing with the disputed premises until determination of the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment