20100212 TZCA Dar es Salaam1

• ,t(.., . • . ' " . l ........ 55 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 49 OF 2009 . - - .- - .T.ANZAl\llAJ>-09.f-S-A.U:r.ttORn.¥~ ·=.w.~,............... ;......... _.__._,' di.-Pl't::reAN'f~ --· -. ... "" ·. .. - VERSUS· · · .. _ - -.. ----- --··- - - •·. --· • --,- ·---fAppl-ication-"-fo_r·Extensioffof time: to-:hle Am_efl~~g ·--.. ·- · -- - · --- · .• , ......cc~,::.: .:: : :.: ,, _ •· · - - Record of·Afipeat:conta in ing Am end e_d~O-ecree l'ro m·· · · · - · · · · · ·: ·· · ·-·-··'.-~_:________ ~---·---·.-··-.th~. pe_~ision ~rif"tne-High·Court·:Qf-:T-:anz~!'l}<?::;~J-_J;>ar-.es.:Salaam)_~-- -·--=-:----- -:--- . ____.,_\ .... :· . ~. . . ... -.- .. ....•·.: .: __ - . ·------·-----·----- ···- ----· - .- -- -~-·~· ---~-;:;::;-·-::;:::..- :-· · .·=::-7 : - - -:: _·::c - _ ·- . • {MibilvcO, l-Lc-~ ~~~-...:c~. _ ; : ••. .- · ·-· .. ":._ ;r x:::~·:: :~~--: ~:==·: ~-~ated_tM _°:_~~~ :o_o_~--·· - ~ ~ = • c . c c e--:-. •·· -~ - - ·-- - 1~~:y · Civil ·Case No~ 101 of ;200·5 .· .. - . . . . . . --------- --------·---· . . . RULING OF tHE COUi<T .... · 25 th January, & 12th February, io10 .............-:··-·· ......... .. ·. The Respondent herein,. had. filed --~f-·smt· in-the· High: Qqµft _oJ _ ... _ • - • -• • ••• - ~ ••- • -- • ~ • - • ,:.. - • ~ - ,n, ~ • • • , • • • • • Tanzania, at Dar es Salaam (Civil caSe No. 101 of2005) against the .f); ,= ::~AT)piieailt; incfi:Tfe·pres]Oefi"tlal-Parastataf sector-Reff)ffll ¢6minjssi0n" - , .•. -. -·. - · -,~,:--~~~-.--:.-:==ror:.•neglig~nce=tbat. • lgcJ,.tQ _,IP,?.?~·2-·_og,_· · - 9 dulteration ,of its -~~---··'..'.,., h-~;--=-•••-=-,--~--:r-=--,,.~.-~:r· cargo..._..... The ,...· ... . _- .- -.- .:. ·. ;: ::~i' -~ApJ)li{oant:]ad;Jn th.~~§~[11~, suit; filed a counter claim agaiost the · · ______, - - -··-·····---·,:·--·· .::·.:c.:..--:;:~;.::-:...::.:.-';;:::.• cc_·: ..:...=.·::...---:..c:·...c.•·=::.·:·.·-·•;,;; __~·.:.:-:··---.~~..:·.·_____ ... :. .. . / · ·...·..·.••.• ··. ··•·Ri;sponde:nt. D ri 18'" May, 20117, the frfaI court (Mihilyci; ]) entired" - - -- - - t . .. . . . . . . . . --.· . -· ••,•-··- ··-·------· ...--. ··:'"--·-_-_·- -·-· ·-··":. ---·· -:·-· .... ---- ...· .. . ... -··-. - .·- .. judgment for the Respondents, . and~di;_~ii~~~d th~---~oun-ter cla(m .. ' .. . .... SG ') L,. - ... Tile Respondent \Na'.: .. :.- Fieved, and so, on 21st May, 2007, filed a Notice of Appeal that c:::mrnenced Civil A12Q.~9.l_NQ~..9.Z_of-200.7.... -,:-::;;--_-::~.....:-~7-·-·-.. -.~:-:-::c·::c-----:-··:- - ·.·--c· ···•-,··••"· -···-··· ·:-·-··-:···:.. -: - :· ··.·:.:-·-·: .::: ;'":-~,c:-.--:~:·-:--:--·:::::. - .. . ...... . ... . . . . . .. The appeal was set for her:ring in . December 2008; Before the - ~-~-----~"---11·eanng ~1neRespondent filed· a-~p~@Um+nary~~~inst the- . -. ··:-.:..... :·.:· . · .--.----. - ·• - _.·.··.·~ --~---·~-·-~:~-~ t.:~>,;_~~~~-,~-:~~-.:~-~-~:~~·~-~---·:.~-.::-:;:..- . - ----· ~:...~,~=-.;~--,='=~ .·co_mp.e_[ebc.yJ3TEh~weaHA-it~.:rmirrg--datect1-:3 th }ebruary1 2009.._th~_ -· - ... -- --:-;.;-.:... ,. :. --.. .-~;_._ ______ . . . _ .-"-·--------------=--=--=-·- .:.:. .. :. -=- - - --··-- - - ·..---_- ·-:--··· --·. ·- -- :·---------·~--~- - - ------' - -: ~ . -~ - -· - - . -~~-~~~~~.~Cou1i_upheicffhe--i;>reffmi·Aar-y··::0·bjectibn.;·--i=he~ rea~gn_:.fgr_.foe.:~cour.ts:~ ...-..... . __:_~-=--·. ;:c._.·.c=.· · - · - · · - · -~-· --·-·-····------··--·~-.-~·~c.--=~-- -· . t. ... .. .. -:-::---::--: ·-··· ·~- . .- . -- : ..... ---- --- . .. .. ... _. ~·_:· ~ -.·~-:-. ::~~:.deiI:s•ieA~·:~is~-.e~nta:ifred::~---;n ~:pag~~ =10Tana~·-1y·.-of~ the_,_.ruling:· rt ·is ..... ...,."y-__·· :,i:-~-c-:.c -Wor;tl:iwJ:iJe.~q-LlGting,.ctR.at-,,19a-rt~,0f4he,.rt1Hflg~-~ .·. 0 -- -"'- · -·---·- - - ------ · --·- ·- _.:_.·_\~-~~~;:.·:;~: .. ___ :·-~~ ... . ·:-_·_,_ ~-~- - - ..• : . ·- - -----. _;__ · -'--.---: - .• ·'t•_- __ : · __· ·"Jt is evident . . that . the .. . . decree>as . ··--.····· ' drawq - ··- up did ... -·:·.'· .. •.··: ·.:.· .- -- . ------ .nor· iepresen{"·cotrect!y . the._jUdgment as· prQ[JQun~ecJ. ... ,Tbe deeree· has ·not specified the .. ______ .._________ . .- ,.. . ··- -- . - - . ' .. . ................. ... -.- - ~ --- __ ____ .:,..:._ _______ · .. -·----·-· ...... . ,, , ,. _____ , re((?(~-!lfftJWd ·.: ... .-. ~W~. : .are .tbe1:efore. in._ etihi;iiir~e"iotailf'·-:= • • •n•-•••• ••• ; .;,:;= =-- ~~_.-:.:~-.-~;: ;,~;_:c~ ~. ~-~,-": .: .~ ~.App@FJcilx;_;iJ;cdees~:n;t~"iehif ~.==- c. '--··- --,-~-· ._:,~·- . - · · - - -----------· - ---~- __.,_____._.....;. - - - ........ ___ __, ~ , ..... ----- -- . ----~-- - ---~-----· ._,.. __ ~. -- -···-·--------· --- · .defe~t(ve as- . contended :·by Mr.··:·:/lf..q_[Q .~ .. a../2d... . .1. • . . . . .:.•.. ---·:----:-.... __ ._.... ..... . __ . ----·· - ... --·.--.- - _. . •.. -----·--:---·-,:-'"'--:-'" ..•... ··• ~-_---:7_-;,:·:-· : ... - . I . At the end c= <:~: ruiing, tl1e Court ordered: _- ~--- ___ _ ______ objec-tiGFJ.-- HoweveTr-in ·.line:· witn Lakhani's .--- - - .~.~ :._- - .;.._.. -- . ; r--- -- . ~ - . ',. -··. -'-~-_-,- ,_-~-.- - - , -_~~ - ~~~:-~:~ -:'-~: ciie/.· we·_ o~der_ that ..the.:decr:ee)Je,,.:amenqe_d-. :·~' --~~: :_-'.--~-- ----------------~---- -·· - --so -as to- comply · With section 101(3) read ... ,, .. ,, - ., '' ,, .. ,,. --- --- --- -- - - ' . - ··- -- ' ' _. ...._._ ... ___ .,..,. .. - .. :-·-;·:~-~- :.: __·. : ·:: --:·---~-___ ,___ ·together w!tli"orde1:_xx ruie_ 6(1} -o_t_~i.ii~:- '"f;Ei _______-_ _ - "_ ·' . · . -·· .. ·-- .. --·- -- -- · ··---·----·-·.-----: ·.--. ·------·· .·:··;, ... --·-·----~ .... ------------·--- .· . . . . II -7 • -i~---.-~- , ' - - - -· • • • ••• • •-.•••••••• ••• r-,••·• • • · - - • - • - • - - • _-_ _ _ _ .... - , ••:-• - {,---~~-~--~--~---.:---· ---- -- . · ----~=·:-~·.::::c.~~::~~-'.:~·:.·:~--It-is in "the spirit of the CourFs"'decisio:rf We,th1nk,-lhat the . ' - --··· -,~- :-,_~ ·:}\pp_licah_t,. hc:1s filed the present applkation· - -· - ---··- - . --- -,; on 9th -April, 2009 ur-ider . . .. ~ -._Rules 3(2). (a) and (b) Rule 8 ·Rule 1.8.(l}J1u.l.e..B§(bJ_ar.id...Rul@-.l04--Gf----:---;_ _____ - .: . · . .In this agglLcatiQQ,_the_App/ic;;ant ~~is,~·_in_·= ~-~~~nc~,:_-_$~e.kJci_g _..for--_ - - - - . ~-r-~-······:~--~---~4--:;~---:--=-~-=----····---·--· ----·-:-~: . . - - - ( ' - - extension ....- .... of . .. ·._· ___ .____ -_.•··:.- -·:• _··_•·--·.·:-- . time within which ~ to file the amended ·decree; and . . _; - - •. I••..,;_ :." ·- · •.. - ---~•~:•.•. ••-: - ,.: -- ·••• -• • ···•• • • . • :- -,-..• . --.-:.-=: = =--·=-·----- _:_-:-:--- -----= =-: ·"":"·~= -- ---- - .. -.-··· .•··-··- . .. · --~ ~~-~:-~~~~~~~~:_f~r ~~~~~ either to a.m~~~- ~h~--~~c?.rd _o~- apf~aJ~_ o~ ~<?_ry!e _a · =-··:=-~-~---·---···----·-·.·--· ___ ·-'"=·-·'··· __ . _. ____ ;___ ·_"--- ...... _.. -...:::..t'·"·'--"-:;:..~c.c:"-""-:..s. -''-"·-'-=· .:;;::..:c::::.._:..-'. .. 7- · · ' - ~ : - ~ - - ~ ~ - - .-_-fre-sli . recor9 qf_,_ q/~lP'°~aL_.4ccor.ding~t0~!=1@--·r-,J:0tiGe-=-ef~Metien, -the.------ 58 4 (a) The record of appeal \Nas filed within a prescribed period but it contained a dec1·ee which- was• -1ncons1stent with the. judgment of the trial cour~ d~ted 18th May, 2007. - --- ------·- - ..... . :,·_-:~~--~.:_;;"-:,.:..:. ~:--,~--fb)--:~th~t1:_'th:i~---Gourt--ordered--amer:1dme:Flt-,.or:;th·~::·?~i0° 9~·He~---;;0 -~ -... 0 -~- - - - ~ -~ ~ . ••-· • • i,-, •• - - ···-- • ·-···- .• • •• ""'"" •.• . . -. ----------··-------· ------- -------- - --- ..;..~.- ------♦---- •"'·_-;"'..•-'·. L - -- _. __ . . ·-·:-··. . -. ---.. --~- .. -- ---• ----. · - ··· ._· (c) · That an amended· decree· has. al_ready :been issued by the · . . . . ... ':· ~= - -~:=~~~:-~:·~=~-- ·; ·- --fria"f court ·on· the~ 20 ·rqifrd,:·:~~2qo~i/:•it1~~-t6il~tt~d:. iii-·th~ ' C th ~ .- . . . . . . . . .Applicant .. _: ~--- _:,~ __L___ .Ibe .motion was.. supported._.by_..tbe....affida)LiL_of ~Mr. .ELISA .ABEL -. ---~. --MSUYA·. . . The centre part: of the . . affidavit. ,s.:par~·g·raphs:6 . - 1 7, and _8. - ... . . '- . . . .. . . . . . ... . .··According to thO$~.. Qpragrapbs,. the-Appfie:aht=briefly-states .tnaf after.-. --. ---------··- ·- ·-=-·-~-:..~:~·~_:. ·-·· .- .. ., - - . ... -· ............ :.· ...... -·· ... ···- . . -~-- . . .. ,. ,. ,. .. ···-·. ... · -~- :amendment of the decree, a letter·was writt~n to the Registrar Hjgh -- -·---------· .-·-----·-------··-·-- ··----- .... - .............. •------·--------------------., ............ .-.---,---------------- ----·--·- .:.:,:· -•---~-••-•-•--•••-'"--~~--•••.::••••-••••,••• •--••:•_•_-•; •----------• --•-•,• •••,-• •••-•••••• 0 0 ·----•-=-•--•·--•-•HO-••,;••·.,: __ -• •··•••• 0 -•• .·: ._-· ~ --~::. ~Court;. . . req~l~itiq_ning_ the amended deGree-on 25-t~ -p~-b;~ary 2009: The . -- -- - - - . . ·-· - --- . . :·.. ···-. ~- . . . ·- . ~--~:.'._..:,~~2lmended:-detree:·was·-jssued··on-"23~4~March·-~oo9·-:arTtton ·9th -April'"·· .. -·-- ·--·-··· ---~-· ·•··-- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2009, the present application was filed. . -~/.:' f· .' ~ . . J'•. ~: :l ,' .. i At the hearing of the applica~:ton Mr; Elisa Msuya appeared to . ··- --·~,---·- ··.: ·: sufficient-=--diHgence;··· to justify···the ·- Gour-t~s--exer:cise-~o.f. ...ifs_ Judi~igl_ _~ _. -- .. ~· ..::·..- · ~dis_crebori__ ' '· to ~~ten9-,.-·time. --- He-therefore prayed· that the application be- -·- ---·.------ --·-···--·-·· -- .... __ ._ - - -------~----- ·- - -- . ..:::... -_....:.:._::_ - -- - .tb~·_;es~t~~Pi tb~ appeaL .·-· ·- ----- -----· - - c~:~:~-: -~-~~1-l~weci~and~costs.abid~e ...__ ~. ..... . :. :... . "' . . · . . -·~-:----······~-----:-·-·····-------- --·-· :The· application. was opposed by: the RespQndent. In answer to .. -:~:: --~: -- 'pa'ragraphs--6,7 and s of the affidaVlt'::~'i:i ::~~fr; ··Msuy°a:, -·Mr.'. W·alfe'r . . . . . . . . jj~~ragr?Ph:?-:J-;4~ .......,·.- .... - .... -· ·-· ;· aAd-5-ef-t:he-Ee 1:1 Rt@i:-a.ffi ciaV-i.t,.-the.Resp_ond ent shows : . - -- - .... ·-·-- that-the·~-·rec~rd was nof only _d~f~ctiv~~--~ff-rniti:o;·· but also that the ' ' . . -- :--·--c---·-~•-< •• ." ~- • • • ' :•.••• •• :_--.•, ::•: • :• • :.-~.:::•,~ •_• - • • ,u•• ~ ~ • • •' • • • :' •: ••: • •• • • •· ;:: . ·_, ~pplicar1t was inadvertent, havin.g failed to :discover the defect and . •. .. .. . . : . . . . . . . J """i"> rectifyfl19TfirtiiaVanCe. bf the 1iiiafi;;g~ithe-=a;;pe~1:..:and iF)0rclif1ati1Y --. .. :~ . . ~- . . . . . . ... .~;_;·;:~~~::' .. ..·.· ·:~·;:~~r~~e.dJrL~fflfog=tb~~--P.Jg~§.IJt ', .. ·.. ·.. - ' - . . _a.'l?QHc~tiQQ_"Without-.furnishing_·sufficient . . ::::····.: -- ·---~.-:~~'""'.'."··::·-·~-.:_:~ .,_.,. ---=-~=~-~=,~,,....,=~=··, ,---· ---· ·- - - . ·•· ... j '. ., ·- ., ----- ,. . ···-·· ---·--------···· -·· ···- ·-·- - .,., ... ' 6 Mr. Elvaison Marc,, ;.~ ·- ,.-,~,: insel who appeared for the · Respondent, ... submitted ti'.~, ·1,/l!ie he dtd .n_g_t_dispute. ~--------':.--:.---··-- .. -···· . . . ·-----------··-: ---:--::+. . thattbJs_court_ had powers to order amE:1C:ment of the l~~3_rd__o( ?.RE~al, _t_h_gt _was__ --- -----·---· -- ~".; · _,_ ---~--:--"7:_ not - t h ~__prcs~t a13~+eaoo_n- .. .__111.. ·- - I fjs view. the central - . - - .. ····- . . •-·-· ........ .. - .··_·_ ..-:_,-_a·~-~ _'.tirn~::.:it··~as--:nis ·vie'w tha(sf6ce the· -·record·:-o(app~ai w~s. defective · - - - - - - : - - - : - - - r ; - ~ ~ ~ -=.--:'--"~--~ -----·-···. -- ·-··• •.- -_. - " .... -·• . - - -- - . ..'-~ -- _! ._·_ ~- -· - .-.ir0rif:·the·-begfn'rHr1_tf,- .. - - --- . --- -- .. . . . th-at. .. was--_wh~D ·time_Jiegan 'to· run against . the . _. . . __ ·Appiicant in --~pplying -to _ fi_le a_n_ -9.0J~oded..:-r.ecord. of· appeal. In. :his .. --.-~ .... ·-. _-::-· -:----:" ---· -··- ·- - -.. _ .:.: .:view1 .19 months had elapsed from the date :of filing ·of the defective -· :. .-·. ·,. ·\• _'record of. ap.peal, to the date of fifing the ..present application. This ·.··was Jn ordinate _d~lay. But even _if_ tim~. Wq$:.to, be reckoned from the -. ··-pate :of the Court s ruling -of 13 th February 2009 the l~arned counsel 1 :..-··;>•... .,;,._"'-~ ·:we·nLon, -- Appfic~,:1~'~_con_duct ·, . :· -.... the ~ derrion.§!f~.!~Q_·:D6!hirm, b.u.t=a·patby.. ~-".·~--~"-":.-,=: .. :.. --·· -- ---·------ - .. ·-_-··-- . - : ·:·.' ·,·· .. ·. :·· . .. . . . . . ,: ··_ an·a indiligen~~-~~ca,_us~, _first it t??½}f, ~Y:~J9J..bjJJJ:_tqa.pp_ly_J9r the .·-~:::~;iiiia·~;~r~Ei ir~m .the:High Court a~rth;;;~~ft~~: ~b~a~;;~;··;~:e,~•- -· ~~ .·. •· . .. - ------. ····-------·-·-------··--·------ ________,,_____________ . ._ - ·-·----------·-·· - ... - - -----·-~-----~--~-- ~---~ -. ···--:-...,._..=-'-'-'.-·....:.:._. _ _ _ . __ .. __ ·-··---- .•. - ........ -~- -· - ._.___ . ·------~--- ·------ ... -- .. -"'---'-'--- - .. ·--·· ., ·': --:·- ·---ccipy of the amended -- - -- ---- __ --- - -__d:~<=J:e.e1-be-w.a.it.gg..._fG.r--aH@tRer--::-14-t!-ay-s'-te-f-H=-- - - - - ~ ·_.,.:. .. . 1 unaccounted for and inexcusable. To make it worse, there was no 61 7 affidavit in reply to the counteraffidavit or counsel's oral submission. -----------·:- .. '.. --· ..Like Mr. Msuya, Mr. Maro ·•. . :...::._·-----------··-:··~------ ··-- also cited . ··----·-- .... ·---~'.. a. number of __d.e.ctded_cases td .... ·-·- . .. •' . reinforce his arguments against the application. At the __eDd. otthe . --- ... - - ,.. .. .. - .. ,·--·-·- . . - .. -- -----··--------- ·--------· - . _.-·:_:·_-_ --·: ;---~s-/~ir-1tecL a-bove botn e:ouns.el - h-ave·--rererred · to- a -number of -- - .. -- :·i•••.••_ - _- ~-==-•~ - ·- - -~dec1s1oos.ofth1s. ,~-:_::~ court-in -their submissions. Iffs now time to ··-ex_;_:a_m_in_e_ ·-·------------ ·· · ;-•·c•,••L:. • ••,•: 0 • •• •• • •• •' •,•• ., . - ; • • • i ·-~- . --: ·: -,._.:-::. ··.-·.:-. _. --- - --.~--- - ... - .... .. .. those ···: .........:· decisions. ... -- .. ~- - . The first case . referred . .: ..:.. ~ ..... to is. that of HARU.NA .. ·••< '"' •'-• . . . . . . . . . . . ,. ·-•-. - •• • ~---- - - _- MPANGAO ··.. -.· .. ::- :- .- :·· & 902 OTHERS v TAN~~N1A .P_QRTLAND_ CEMENT · -CO:"lT(? (CAT}Civil Appeal No. 1-0:of2007.-(Unreeorted) In thafcase - --therewa·s an -invalid decree because· it was-'not }Jrciperly dated. ·The - . -~ . _- -· ___· ,.effe.tt-df that decision was that a defedfve . .. . . . ·:.·. . r~cord.of . .. appeal could not . . . •- .. . .. ·- . . . . ~ be .cured . .. .. . - . by filing . a supplementary . - record-of - - a12Q~9I . µncler, Rule 9-2{-3) . . . . . . .;, ... ·_: . .·o(th:e···:Rules, and that a party who finds himseff unable to file a valid -~:::::~g;;;;~l)i'rr~~, '.;~-lJresenrea-ti~~ -Coif~ -;-;~;e;;-5;' ~PTY;ng-fOr-~c---,,. . . ~ . - . . ____·_·_ --·-·- - ------·-·---------- -----------·--- ---·-----·-·-·------ ----·- -- -··. -- ~;-=:~=exterrsibn:~of~time·-ander RUie a-;:wifnTn-:WlifcB. to .·:.tile· ~a_·: copy .of the··-- _-- -:·.. . . - ----_,,,----:---· . ··decree :or a. . fresh .rec9r_g . ---- .. - . .- - --- 9.f_a_Qp_~91.__ Mr~J:'.L~ro__QJd._:not haY_e .any _ . . . . -·rese·rvaHOns ·to. the statement of the law in that case. We agree that • 8 · the current position of the la1'v' on discovering that a record of appeal . contains a defective con=:: document, is · as .fqr,:nula~~d )n ·---.-:··-----:-·,. _· .· -:--..·-_:,.--·:.:..-_:._.· -··. . . ·- .---·-- - . ---~--~~' _.· -···- ..__ ~ ····. •···-·····. - --·--·-··· MPANGAO'S case. This case was also referred to in the next case - . . . - ----·-----~- ----- ------- - -- ~ - ~- . ····-- -~-_:.:~--·~irea-oy·rvfr.- Ms-uya;· "that.qt TH_E~NJ\IE OFTH_E..IJNIVERSIB'-OE- · -~ ~-:---.~-:-: --~·;;.._~---··.-.- -~-~-- --<~:.;,-:·-:;~~---"····'·...;_-•. ·--,-:- --:---~-...---- - . ·:-·:--·-_--_... -... ~~ ~ ··-· ---·--· - .. . - · · · _ .. Appi~GatjGR-N o•.-48-0f--?Q.Q8~fL:J-Rfe130r-teEij-where--:-t:r1e~~ApJ3Hea Ai:---had~- ---_ ·~. -· .. _.,:-: __ _.. ___ ..,.,,_.· __ ..,.___ ..... - --~--·· --· ·· ... -. --- .·- - ----- ; .. -·.. . . - . - . - .... ·------··· - -------·--•-·------ . --·· .. ··---· -_-'.".'·~,--·:"·~:~~-pp!.f~d·:~~~~{~g~~nted ' .. ' ~xtensio1i-of time to·rne-an amen:ded . ·dEicree. In . - - - ~ , - - , , . - - · - · - -··-•.. " . !- _·-,-~,~=z . . -~res~or:ise,->Mr.-··Ma:ro; . . -1:earned -~ - tolJn~~1;: ren:farked-,Th~f:the . :~ase was· .. . . .. ·:. ::-. -.-.._.·-::.":..~- -- . -·---- -- -, ·. . ·.;::·.~~· .:.~ gJ;iP:. _qJ.lthocityJqrJh.e statement thatit.was not theJjuty of the court •. • , ....:~---•• • -•• •: ~• ... •-••~h•••:•••,•• ._,,,,__.• •- ,_ • ~.• :•,._ _ _,,,. .. .-•-• • ••, • • •• ,.., •• ... , • • • • to-direct how to file.an am~nded order .. _ - .. •·- . .. -:,.-.:.Iff our .yiew. that decision ,s only· confirmation of this Court's ---- · .·-;- . . . ' .~..· : ." . · RQ-~ersto ·••;••-... . __ order : amendments . of docum~nts . in th~ rec;ord. ·ofappeaL •. . . . • - _:.~~ - ·- ·... -- . -. ...... - -- - - .. .•.:·'.. ..":::;;:~ . .... ~~tri-:-ROYJtL - -·-tNSUAANCE· .. -. .. . . "{t): irb· ~--ir.·KIWENGWA--ST-RAN-D·-·-. ..;, . . . _______ . .. ·. . . ·- ·- i . · the Applicant-had. t,een· diligeritly.following up his case in Court. Mr . .. . - ·.·-.· ·-::··. - . ·: ·. . -· ... ·-· --·-··-···: ·. - - .. . . ·_ . ·-. - :...----. --- . -·-··-··-- ·_ -·- - -- . ·. . . : . . . . -- . . . _M.$_1JY~ ..s.ou.ght. to .reJyon thi.s case to praythatthe Co.urt: finds .that he deserved a similar sympathy, and his application be granted. Mr.