MISC NO 23535 OF 2024 TARGET BRANDS LIMITED VRS JAMES UISSO

MISC NO 23535 OF 2024 TARGET BRANDS LIMITED VRS JAMES UISSO

Applicant demonstrated technical delay and diligence; delay was not inordinate; sufficient cause established for extension of time.

Citation
MISC NO 23535 OF 2024 TARGET BRANDS LIMITED VRS JAMES UISSO
Parties
Applicant: Target Brands Limited; Respondent: James Uisso
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ex Parte Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision Application, Technical Delay, Limitation Period
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Target Brands Limited

Applicant

James Uisso

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Labour Application / Ex Parte Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file revision application
  2. 2 Whether the delay was technical and justifiable

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant demonstrated technical delay and diligence; delay was not inordinate; sufficient cause established for extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant granted fourteen (14) days leave to file intended revision application from date of order