target international t ltd vs godfrey consumer products 2022 tzhccomd 236 14 june 2022

target international t ltd vs godfrey consumer products 2022 tzhccomd 236 14 june 2022

The temporary injunction granted in July 2020 expired by operation of law after six months, and no application for extension was made. The maximum aggregate period of one year has also lapsed. There is no subsisting injunction to be discharged, varied, or set aside. The application is overtaken by events and is struck out.

Citation
target international t ltd vs godfrey consumer products 2022 tzhccomd 236 14 june 2022
Parties
Applicant: Target International (T) Limited; Respondent: Godfrey Consumer Products Ltd
Court
TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
14 June 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Application to Discharge, Vary, or Set Aside Injunction
Outcome
Application struck out as overtaken by events; no subsisting injunction to discharge.
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunctions, Expiry of Injunctions, Procedural Lapse
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Temporary Injunctions Expiry of Injunctions Procedural Lapse

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Target International (T) Limited

Applicant

Godfrey Consumer Products Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Application to Discharge, Vary, or Set Aside Injunction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the temporary injunction granted in Miscellaneous Commercial Application No. 54 of 2019 remains valid or has expired by operation of law
  2. 2 Whether there is any subsisting order for injunction to be discharged, varied, or set aside

Ratio Decidendi

The temporary injunction granted in July 2020 expired by operation of law after six months, and no application for extension was made. The maximum aggregate period of one year has also lapsed. There is no subsisting injunction to be discharged, varied, or set aside. The application is overtaken by events and is struck out.

Court Disposition

Application struck out as overtaken by events; no subsisting injunction to discharge.

Orders

  • Each party to bear its own costs.