CIVIL CASE NO
Defendant failed to obtain leave to defend or appear; thus, under Order XXXV Rule 2(2), the allegations in the plaint are deemed admitted and judgment is entered for the plaintiffs for the claimed sum with interest.
- Citation
- CIVIL CASE NO
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Tarime District Council; Plaintiff: The Attorney General; Defendant: Kaserkandis Construction Ltd
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 1 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Summary Procedure / Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the plaintiffs
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Service Levy, Statutory Revenue Collection, Default Judgment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tarime District Council
Plaintiff
The Attorney General
Plaintiff
Kaserkandis Construction Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Summary Procedure / Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant is liable to pay the claimed service levy and exemplary damages to the plaintiffs under summary procedure
- 2 Whether the defendant obtained leave to defend the suit
Ratio Decidendi
Defendant failed to obtain leave to defend or appear; thus, under Order XXXV Rule 2(2), the allegations in the plaint are deemed admitted and judgment is entered for the plaintiffs for the claimed sum with interest.
Court Disposition
judgment for the plaintiffs
Orders
- Defendant to pay TZS 309,037,031.57 to the plaintiffs
- Interest at 15% per annum on the decretal sum from judgment date until final payment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment