tatu manyoka vs charles kaberuka 2010 tzca 170 11 october 2010

The appeal is incompetent because the decree accompanying it bears a date different from the judgment, violating mandatory procedural rules and rendering the appeal incurably defective.

Citation: tatu manyoka vs charles kaberuka 2010 tzca 170 11 october 2010
Parties: Appellant: Tatu Manyoka; Respondent: Charles Kaberuka
Court: TZCA
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 11 October 2010
Procedural Posture: Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome: appeal struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics: Decree Validity, Appeal Competency, Procedural Irregularity
Source Language: English

Civil Procedure Decree Validity Appeal Competency Procedural Irregularity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2

Parties

Tatu Manyoka

Appellant

Charles Kaberuka

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

1 Whether the appeal is incompetent due to a defective decree accompanying the memorandum of appeal
2 Whether a decree bearing a date different from the judgment date renders the appeal incurably defective

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal is incompetent because the decree accompanying it bears a date different from the judgment, violating mandatory procedural rules and rendering the appeal incurably defective.

Court Disposition

appeal struck out as incompetent

Orders

preliminary objection allowed
appeal struck out