techpack t ltd vs tanesco another 2023 tzhccomd 220 17 july 2023

techpack t ltd vs tanesco another 2023 tzhccomd 220 17 july 2023

The applicant failed to specify the genuine amount owed or provide sufficient facts to demonstrate a triable issue. Mere assertions of exaggeration without substantiation do not meet the threshold for leave to defend a summary suit.

Citation
techpack t ltd vs tanesco another 2023 tzhccomd 220 17 july 2023
Parties
Applicant: Techpack Tanzania Limited; 1st Respondent: Tanzania Electrical Supply Company Ltd; 2nd Respondent: Attorney General
Court
TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
17 July 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appear and Defend Summary Suit
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Summary Suit, Leave to Defend, Affidavit Evidence, Debt Recovery
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Techpack Tanzania Limited

Applicant

Tanzania Electrical Supply Company Ltd

1st Respondent

Attorney General

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Commercial Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appear and Defend Summary Suit

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has disclosed sufficient facts demonstrating a triable issue to warrant leave to defend the summary suit

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to specify the genuine amount owed or provide sufficient facts to demonstrate a triable issue. Mere assertions of exaggeration without substantiation do not meet the threshold for leave to defend a summary suit.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Applicant to pay costs