edu computer t ltd vs t investment bank ltd 2004 tzhccomd 57 9 september 2004

edu computer t ltd vs t investment bank ltd 2004 tzhccomd 57 9 september 2004

The applicant admitted default and liability in correspondence, negating the existence of a triable issue or likelihood of success. No irreparable loss was established, and the appointment of the receiver and manager was contractually justified. The four conditions for a temporary injunction were not met.

Citation
edu computer t ltd vs t investment bank ltd 2004 tzhccomd 57 9 september 2004
Parties
Applicant/plaintiff: EDU COMPUTERS (T) LTD; Respondent/defendant: TANZANIA INVESTMENT BANK LTD
Court
TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
9 September 2004
Procedural Posture
Application for Temporary Injunction / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Temporary Injunction, Credit Facility Agreement, Appointment of Receiver and Manager, Debenture
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

EDU COMPUTERS (T) LTD

Applicant/plaintiff

TANZANIA INVESTMENT BANK LTD

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Temporary Injunction / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a temporary injunction restraining the respondent from interfering with its business pending determination of the main suit
  2. 2 Whether the appointment of a receiver and manager was premature or justified under the credit facility and debenture agreements

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant admitted default and liability in correspondence, negating the existence of a triable issue or likelihood of success. No irreparable loss was established, and the appointment of the receiver and manager was contractually justified. The four conditions for a temporary injunction were not met.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • Application for temporary injunction is dismissed with costs