teofrid stephano kabelege vs republic 2023 tzhc 280 15 february 2023

teofrid stephano kabelege vs republic 2023 tzhc 280 15 february 2023

The applicant provided genuine and sufficient reasons for the delay, namely that his initial appeal was struck out for lack of notice of intention to appeal, and he acted promptly thereafter. The court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
teofrid stephano kabelege vs republic 2023 tzhc 280 15 february 2023
Parties
Applicant: Teofrid Stephano Kabelege; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
15 February 2023
Procedural Posture
Misc. Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Conviction and Sentence
Source Language
english
Criminal Law Criminal Procedure Extension of Time Appeal Procedure Conviction and Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Teofrid Stephano Kabelege

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Misc. Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file notice of intention to appeal and appeal out of time

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant provided genuine and sufficient reasons for the delay, namely that his initial appeal was struck out for lack of notice of intention to appeal, and he acted promptly thereafter. The court exercised its discretion to grant the extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Applicant to file notice of intention to appeal and appeal within ten (10) days after being provided with a copy of this ruling