thabit mohamed mgwalu vs morsadi hassan malende another 2018 tzhclandd 143 11 may 2018

thabit mohamed mgwalu vs morsadi hassan malende another 2018 tzhclandd 143 11 may 2018

The appellant acquired lawful title to the disputed land by adverse possession, having occupied and developed it since 1970 without disturbance. The respondents had no authority to sell the land, and the appellate tribunal erred in disregarding the trial tribunal's assessment of witness credibility.

Citation
thabit mohamed mgwalu vs morsadi hassan malende another 2018 tzhclandd 143 11 may 2018
Parties
Appellant: Thabit Mohamed Mgwalu; 1st Respondent: Morsadi Hassan Malende; 2nd Respondent: Sauda Ally Malende
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
11 May 2018
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment on Second Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Adverse Possession, Title to Land, Credibility of Evidence, Sale of Land Without Title
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Thabit Mohamed Mgwalu

Appellant

Morsadi Hassan Malende

1st Respondent

Sauda Ally Malende

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Appeal / Judgment on Second Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the appellant acquired title to the disputed land by adverse possession
  2. 2 Whether the respondents had authority to sell the disputed land
  3. 3 Whether the appellate tribunal erred in assessing the credibility of evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant acquired lawful title to the disputed land by adverse possession, having occupied and developed it since 1970 without disturbance. The respondents had no authority to sell the land, and the appellate tribunal erred in disregarding the trial tribunal's assessment of witness credibility.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Decision and orders of the District Land and Housing Tribunal in Land Appeal No. 41 of 2016 quashed
  • Decision of the trial Ward Tribunal No. 35 of 2015 upheld