Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

thadeus l makoi vs national insurance corporation of tanzania ltd another 2009 tzhc 96 3 june 2009

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Since the applicant demonstrated a claim and there was no objection from the respondents, leave to institute the intended suit is granted.

Court disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Leave granted to the applicant to institute legal proceedings against the respondents
  • Costs of the application awarded to the applicant

02

Material facts

Parties

Thadeus L. Makoi

Applicant Counsel: Mr. El. Maamry

National Insurance Corporation of Tanzania Ltd

1st Respondent Counsel: Mr. Victor

Parastatal Sector Reform Commission

2nd Respondent Counsel: Ms. Shiyo

Amounts and remedies

  • Date of Last Order: 20,090,608
  • Date of Ruling: 20,090,603

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Institute Suit

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant should be granted leave to institute a suit against the respondents

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant claims to have a cause of action against the 1st respondent arising from an accident involving his insured motor vehicle, and seeks leave to file a suit as required by law.
Respondent
Both respondents, through their counsel, did not object to the application.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 9(1) of the Bankruptcy Act [Cap. 25 RE.2002]; Section 43 of the Public Corporations Act [Cap. 257 RE.2002]

    Leave of the court is required to institute a suit against a specified public corporation under the Public Corporations Act and Bankruptcy Act.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Since the applicant demonstrated a claim and there was no objection from the respondents, leave to institute the intended suit is granted.

Court disposition

Application granted

  • Leave granted to the applicant to institute legal proceedings against the respondents
  • Costs of the application awarded to the applicant

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 3 June 2009

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 3 June 2009

thadeus l makoi vs national insurance corporation of tanzania ltd another 2009 tzhc 96 3 june 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA

AT DAR ES SALAAM -\i >>j.. v ^ ^ v : • _ • j MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2 OF 2007 THADEUS L.MAKOI..... ............ ............................. APPLICANT

VERSUS

NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION ; OF TANZANIA LTD AND ANOTHER...................... i i . ;

RESPONDENT . Date o f Last Order 08/ 06/2009 * t ^ ( Date o f Ruling 03/ 06/2006 3Ax.

RULING MWARIJA.J. J’FUCATldlS V 1 !J. • This is an application fo'r l'eiave to institute a suit against the * " <*•?0 f "i+ respondents; the National Insurance Corporation of Tanzania Ltd, a } specified public corporation and^He Parastatal Sector Reform ' \TJiO 1 Commission. The application jhas been brought under S. 9 (1) of ( .. A l . w i X * • . w\.w the Bankruptcy [Act Cap. 25 RE.2002], S.43 of the Public i t v. JUR'r ( Corporations Act, [Cap. 257 RE.2002] and S.95 of the Civil Procedure Code [Cap. 33 RE.20 l In his affidavit, the applicant, inaaeus L.Makoi who was ■s 25 . represented m this application by Mr. El.Maamiy, learned counsel deponed to the effect that he has ;a cljsiim against the 1st.respondent arising out of an accident which involved the applicant's motor I.G.. .•» vehicle insured of by the said JsVresp^ndent. Since his claim could ; J Co not be settled, he intents to fileva ^ ii^ in the court of law. The 1st respondent was , represented by Mr Victor, learned counsel while the 2nd re s p ^ ^ fjjt'w a s represented by Ms. Shiyo, learned counsel. Both learned counsel did not have any objection to the application. Having considered the appli-c^t^n especially the supporting : ’, iC affidavit sworn by the appllc^gt-^^jgjs there has been no objection by the respondent, I hereby grant leave to the applicant to institute his intended legal proceedi$g§ iffc g p j^ QCosts of this application is awarded to the applicant ~ , A.,G?M^^xija

JUDGE 3/612009 :iD'v 2 03/06/09 Coram: Hon A.G.Mwarija,J i rv For the Applicant - Mr El.Maamry For the 1st Respondent For the 2nd Respondent Ms. Shiyo CC: Yasintha Ruling delivered A .(iJ*M W arija . £ .'r'i. \VvvV,

JUDGE 4 3/6/2009 ■v t* f'

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Bankruptcy Act [Cap. 25 RE.2002]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Public Corporations Act [Cap. 257 RE.2002]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Civil Procedure Code [Cap. 33 RE.2002]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.