thadeus l makoi vs national insurance corporation of tanzania ltd another 2009 tzhc 96 3 june 2009
- Citation
- thadeus l makoi vs national insurance corporation of tanzania ltd another 2009 tzhc 96 3 june 2009
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 3 June 2009
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Institute Suit
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 3 June 2009
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Institute Suit
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
Since the applicant demonstrated a claim and there was no objection from the respondents, leave to institute the intended suit is granted.
Court disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Leave granted to the applicant to institute legal proceedings against the respondents
- Costs of the application awarded to the applicant
02
Material facts
Parties
Thadeus L. Makoi
Applicant Counsel: Mr. El. MaamryNational Insurance Corporation of Tanzania Ltd
1st Respondent Counsel: Mr. VictorParastatal Sector Reform Commission
2nd Respondent Counsel: Ms. ShiyoAmounts and remedies
- Date of Last Order: 20,090,608
- Date of Ruling: 20,090,603
03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Institute Suit
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the applicant should be granted leave to institute a suit against the respondents
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant claims to have a cause of action against the 1st respondent arising from an accident involving his insured motor vehicle, and seeks leave to file a suit as required by law.
- Respondent
- Both respondents, through their counsel, did not object to the application.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 9(1) of the Bankruptcy Act [Cap. 25 RE.2002]; Section 43 of the Public Corporations Act [Cap. 257 RE.2002]
Leave of the court is required to institute a suit against a specified public corporation under the Public Corporations Act and Bankruptcy Act.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
Since the applicant demonstrated a claim and there was no objection from the respondents, leave to institute the intended suit is granted.
Court disposition
Application granted
- Leave granted to the applicant to institute legal proceedings against the respondents
- Costs of the application awarded to the applicant
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 3 June 2009
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 3 June 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA
AT DAR ES SALAAM -\i >>j.. v ^ ^ v : • _ • j MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2 OF 2007 THADEUS L.MAKOI..... ............ ............................. APPLICANT
VERSUS
NATIONAL INSURANCE CORPORATION ; OF TANZANIA LTD AND ANOTHER...................... i i . ;
RESPONDENT . Date o f Last Order 08/ 06/2009 * t ^ ( Date o f Ruling 03/ 06/2006 3Ax.
RULING MWARIJA.J. J’FUCATldlS V 1 !J. • This is an application fo'r l'eiave to institute a suit against the * " <*•?0 f "i+ respondents; the National Insurance Corporation of Tanzania Ltd, a } specified public corporation and^He Parastatal Sector Reform ' \TJiO 1 Commission. The application jhas been brought under S. 9 (1) of ( .. A l . w i X * • . w\.w the Bankruptcy [Act Cap. 25 RE.2002], S.43 of the Public i t v. JUR'r ( Corporations Act, [Cap. 257 RE.2002] and S.95 of the Civil Procedure Code [Cap. 33 RE.20 l In his affidavit, the applicant, inaaeus L.Makoi who was ■s 25 . represented m this application by Mr. El.Maamiy, learned counsel deponed to the effect that he has ;a cljsiim against the 1st.respondent arising out of an accident which involved the applicant's motor I.G.. .•» vehicle insured of by the said JsVresp^ndent. Since his claim could ; J Co not be settled, he intents to fileva ^ ii^ in the court of law. The 1st respondent was , represented by Mr Victor, learned counsel while the 2nd re s p ^ ^ fjjt'w a s represented by Ms. Shiyo, learned counsel. Both learned counsel did not have any objection to the application. Having considered the appli-c^t^n especially the supporting : ’, iC affidavit sworn by the appllc^gt-^^jgjs there has been no objection by the respondent, I hereby grant leave to the applicant to institute his intended legal proceedi$g§ iffc g p j^ QCosts of this application is awarded to the applicant ~ , A.,G?M^^xija
JUDGE 3/612009 :iD'v 2 03/06/09 Coram: Hon A.G.Mwarija,J i rv For the Applicant - Mr El.Maamry For the 1st Respondent For the 2nd Respondent Ms. Shiyo CC: Yasintha Ruling delivered A .(iJ*M W arija . £ .'r'i. \VvvV,
JUDGE 4 3/6/2009 ■v t* f'
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.