attorney general vs mohamed liundi another 2022 tzhc 15139 29 november 2022

The application was struck out because it was based on documents drawn by a person who, at the time of drawing and filing, was not a qualified state attorney authorized by the Solicitor General, rendering the documents and the application invalid.

Citation: attorney general vs mohamed liundi another 2022 tzhc 15139 29 november 2022
Parties: Applicant: The Attorney General; 1st Respondent: Mohamed Liundi; 2nd Respondent: Dar es Salaam Water and Sewage Corporation
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 29 November 2022
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
Outcome: Application struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Qualification of Legal Practitioners, Preliminary Objections, Practice and Procedure
Source Language: English

Civil Procedure Administrative Law Extension of Time Qualification of Legal Practitioners Preliminary Objections Practice and Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2

Parties

The Attorney General

Applicant

Mohamed Liundi

1st Respondent

Dar es Salaam Water and Sewage Corporation

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objections

Legal Issues

1 Whether the application was drawn by a qualified person as required by law
2 Whether the preliminary objection qualifies as a pure point of law
3 Consequence of documents drawn by an unqualified person

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application struck out as incompetent

Orders

Application struck out for being based on invalid documents drawn by an unqualified person
No order as to costs