attorney general vs stephen makombe and 15 others 2020 tzhclandd 4012 30 august 2020
Applicant was not party to previous proceedings, acted promptly upon knowledge of the decision, sufficient cause for delay established, application for extension of time granted.
- Citation
- attorney general vs stephen makombe and 15 others 2020 tzhclandd 4012 30 august 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: The Attorney General; 1st Respondent: Stephen Makombe; 2nd Respondent: Charles Bundala; 3rd Respondent: Harrison Fungo; 4th Respondent: Dishon Kayumbu; 5th Respondent: Lucian M. William; 6th Respondent: George M. Makuke; 7th Respondent: Isack Mkilya; 8th Respondent: John Onani; 9th Respondent: Charles Wihenge; 10th Respondent: Richard Lyatuu; 11th Respondent: Yusuph Suleiman (Administrator of the Estate of Saad Suleiman); 12th Respondent: Aron Ole Mung'anga'ri; 13th Respondent: John N. Lusinde; 14th Respondent: Mwalimu Sango; 15th Respondent: Moses M. Akyoo; 16th Respondent: Tanzania Zambia Railway Authority (TAZARA)
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Revision, Public Interest, Execution of Judgment
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Attorney General
Applicant
Stephen Makombe
1st Respondent
Charles Bundala
2nd Respondent
Harrison Fungo
3rd Respondent
Dishon Kayumbu
4th Respondent
Lucian M. William
5th Respondent
George M. Makuke
6th Respondent
Isack Mkilya
7th Respondent
John Onani
8th Respondent
Charles Wihenge
9th Respondent
Richard Lyatuu
10th Respondent
Yusuph Suleiman (Administrator of the Estate of Saad Suleiman)
11th Respondent
Aron Ole Mung'anga'ri
12th Respondent
John N. Lusinde
13th Respondent
Mwalimu Sango
14th Respondent
Moses M. Akyoo
15th Respondent
Tanzania Zambia Railway Authority (TAZARA)
16th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established sufficient cause for extension of time to file revision
- 2 Whether the applicant's delay was justified
- 3 Whether alleged illegality in the Tribunal's decision warrants extension
Ratio Decidendi
Applicant was not party to previous proceedings, acted promptly upon knowledge of the decision, sufficient cause for delay established, application for extension of time granted.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Applicant to file application for revision within 21 days from date of ruling
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment