RULING The AG vs

RULING The AG vs

Applicant accounted for the delay and established sufficient cause, including alleged illegalities and procedural improprieties in the impugned judgment. No opposition from respondents. Court exercised its discretion to grant extension of time.

Citation
RULING The AG vs
Parties
Applicant: The Attorney General; 1st Respondent: Abel Matabwa; 2nd Respondent: Erasto Farax Swai; 3rd Respondent: Patty Interplan Limited; 4th Respondent: Mbinga District Council
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
16 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision, Illegality, Discretionary Powers
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision Illegality Discretionary Powers

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Attorney General

Applicant

Abel Matabwa

1st Respondent

Erasto Farax Swai

2nd Respondent

Patty Interplan Limited

3rd Respondent

Mbinga District Council

4th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether the applicant has advanced good and sufficient cause for extension of time to file an application for revision

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant accounted for the delay and established sufficient cause, including alleged illegalities and procedural improprieties in the impugned judgment. No opposition from respondents. Court exercised its discretion to grant extension of time.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Applicant granted fourteen days from date of ruling to lodge application for revision before the court.
  • No order as to costs.