attorney general vs raksha gadhvi others 2024 tzca 10 30 january 2024

attorney general vs raksha gadhvi others 2024 tzca 10 30 january 2024

Alleged illegalities in the High Court decision, specifically failure to join the Attorney General and denial of the right to be heard, constitute sufficient cause for extension of time to file an application for revision.

Citation
attorney general vs raksha gadhvi others 2024 tzca 10 30 january 2024
Parties
Applicant: The Attorney General; 1st Respondent: Raksha Gadhvi; 2nd Respondent: Jehangir Aziz; 3rd Respondent: National Housing Corporation
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
30 January 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Revision
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Right to Be Heard, Joinder of Parties
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Administrative Law Extension of Time Revision Illegality as Ground for Extension Right to Be Heard Joinder of Parties

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Attorney General

Applicant

Raksha Gadhvi

1st Respondent

Jehangir Aziz

2nd Respondent

National Housing Corporation

3rd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Revision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether illegality in the High Court decision constitutes sufficient cause for extension of time to file revision
  2. 2 Whether failure to join the Attorney General and denial of right to be heard amounts to illegality

Ratio Decidendi

Alleged illegalities in the High Court decision, specifically failure to join the Attorney General and denial of the right to be heard, constitute sufficient cause for extension of time to file an application for revision.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Extension of time granted to the applicant to file the intended application for revision within sixty days from the date of delivery of this ruling.