director general lapf pension fund vs pascal ngalo 2020 tzca 289 10 june 2020
The delay was technical, not actual, as the applicant was pursuing the same matter in court; the omission to cite rule 10 was inconsequential and did not oust the court's jurisdiction; extension of time is granted.
- Citation
- director general lapf pension fund vs pascal ngalo 2020 tzca 289 10 june 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: The Director General LAPF Pensions Fund; Respondent: Pascal Ngalo
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Technical Delay, Appellate Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Director General LAPF Pensions Fund
Applicant
Pascal Ngalo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file notice and application for leave to appeal
- 2 Effect of omission to cite rule 10 of the Court of Appeal Rules
Ratio Decidendi
The delay was technical, not actual, as the applicant was pursuing the same matter in court; the omission to cite rule 10 was inconsequential and did not oust the court's jurisdiction; extension of time is granted.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Applicant to file intended notice and application for leave within fourteen days of delivery of this ruling
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment