the registered trustees of agricultural inputs trust fund vs the registered trustees of tunduru district council another 2012 tzhccomd 39 14 december 2012

the registered trustees of agricultural inputs trust fund vs the registered trustees of tunduru district council another 2012 tzhccomd 39 14 december 2012

The inclusion of the Executive Director as a defendant was a bona fide mistake; the proper party is the Tunduru District Council. The Deed of Guarantee does not require compulsory registration as it does not acknowledge receipt or payment of consideration. The question of authorization to sign the Deed is a matter of evidence, not a pure point of law suitable for preliminary objection. The 3rd Defendant's preliminary objection was abandoned and dismissed.

Citation
the registered trustees of agricultural inputs trust fund vs the registered trustees of tunduru district council another 2012 tzhccomd 39 14 december 2012
Parties
Plaintiff: The Registered Trustees of Agricultural Inputs Trust Fund; 1st Defendant: The Registered Trustees of Tunduru District Council; 2nd Defendant: The Executive Director, Tunduru District Council; 3rd Defendant: Abbas Export Limited
Court
TZHCCOMD
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
14 December 2012
Procedural Posture
Commercial Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objections
Outcome
Preliminary objections by 2nd Defendant partly upheld; 3rd Defendant's preliminary objection dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Preliminary Objection, Cause of Action, Guarantee Enforcement, Misjoinder of Parties, Document Registration, Authority to Contract
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Registered Trustees of Agricultural Inputs Trust Fund

Plaintiff

The Registered Trustees of Tunduru District Council

1st Defendant

The Executive Director, Tunduru District Council

2nd Defendant

Abbas Export Limited

3rd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objections

  1. 1 Whether there is a cause of action against the 2nd Defendant (Executive Director, Tunduru District Council)
  2. 2 Whether the suit is incompetent as the guarantee is unenforceable in law
  3. 3 Whether the plaint discloses a cause of action against the 3rd Defendant

Ratio Decidendi

The inclusion of the Executive Director as a defendant was a bona fide mistake; the proper party is the Tunduru District Council. The Deed of Guarantee does not require compulsory registration as it does not acknowledge receipt or payment of consideration. The question of authorization to sign the Deed is a matter of evidence, not a pure point of law suitable for preliminary objection. The 3rd Defendant's preliminary objection was abandoned and dismissed.

Court Disposition

Preliminary objections by 2nd Defendant partly upheld; 3rd Defendant's preliminary objection dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The name 'Executive Director' is struck out from the plaint; Plaintiff to proceed against Tunduru District Council as 2nd Defendant.
  • Costs in the cause.