Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

registered trustees of khoja shia ithna asher jammat vs aliasgher muktar saajan 2022 tzhc 14783 10 november 2022

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The application for execution is struck out because leave to file notice of appeal out of time has been granted to the respondent, and proceeding would contravene the constitutional right to appeal.

Court disposition

Application struck out

Orders

  • Application struck out without costs
  • Applicant may refile after determination of intended appeal proceedings

02

Material facts

Parties

The Registered Trustees of Khoja Shia Ithna Asher Jammat

Applicant

Aliasgher Muktar Saajan

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Decreed Sum (arrears of Rent): TZS 300,000,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application to Summon Judgment Debtor and Commit to Civil Prison

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The respondent has failed to pay Tshs 300,000,000 as decreed in Land Appeal No. 7 of 2017, has transferred assets to avoid execution, and should be summoned and possibly committed to civil prison.
Respondent
He is aggrieved by the appellate decision and has initiated proceedings for extension of time to appeal to the Court of Appeal, thus execution should not proceed.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Article 13(6)(a) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania

    Execution proceedings should not proceed when an application for leave to appeal is pending and leave has been granted.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The application for execution is struck out because leave to file notice of appeal out of time has been granted to the respondent, and proceeding would contravene the constitutional right to appeal.

Obiter and limits

  • The applicant may refile the application after determination of the intended application for leave to appeal and the intended appeal, if determined in her favour.

Court disposition

Application struck out

  • Application struck out without costs
  • Applicant may refile after determination of intended appeal proceedings

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 10 November 2022

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 10 November 2022

registered trustees of khoja shia ithna asher jammat vs aliasgher muktar saajan 2022 tzhc 14783 10 november 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

LAND DIVISION

AT MOSHI MISC. LAND APPLICATION NO. 09 OF 2022 (Arising from Land Appeal No. 7 o f 2017 originating from Land Application No. 54 o f 2016 o f the District Land and Housing Tribunal o f Moshi at Moshi)

THE REGISTERED TRUSTEES OF KHOJA SHIA ITHNA ASHER JAMMAT........................................ H/HOLDER/ APPLICANT

VERSUS ALIASGHER MUKTAR SAAJAN....... J/DEBTOR/ RESPONDENT

RULING 08/9/2022 & 10/11/2022 SIMFUKWE, J. The applicant THE REGISTERED TRUSTEES OF KHOJA SHIA ITHNA ASHER JAMMAT filed this application under Order XLIII Rule 35 (1) and (2), section 38 (1), 42 (c), 44(1) and 95 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019 and any other enabling provisions of the laws, seeking the following orders: 1. That, this Honourable Court be pleased to summon the Respondent/Judgment debtor above named in person\ and require him to show cause as to why a balance o f Tshs 300,000,000/= a decreed sum in Land Case Appeal Number 07 o f 2017, should not be settled in full satisfaction o f the decree.

2. That, in case o f disobedience to orders in execution; the said Respondent, A/iasgher Muktar Saajan, be arrested and committed to Prison as Civil Prisoner.

3. Costs o f this application be provided for.

4. Any other reliefs deemedjust and fit this honorable court to grant, (sic) The application was supported by the affidavit deponed by Mr. Ibrahim Haji, the Chairman of Board of Trustees of the applicant In the said affidavit it has been deponed inter alia that in Land Appeal Case No. 7 of 2017 it was decreed that the respondent should pay the applicant a total sum of Tshs 300,000,000/ being arrears of rent up to and including February 2022 when the disputed premises were handled over to the applicant. That, all efforts have been taken by the applicant to recover the rental arrears in a thin air as the respondent has transferred all of his movable properties to his limited company commonly known as A2Z Healthcare Ltd to avoid the applicant to enjoy fruits of her decree. It has been deponed further that the applicant is ready, willing and prepared to pay for any costs for keeping the respondent as civil prisoner at any prison that this court will deem fit for him to be detained. In his counter affidavit, the respondent stated among other things that he is still aggrieved by the first Appellate court's decision and that he has already initiated processes to reinstate the second appeal vide Misc. Land Application No. 11 of 2022. That, the gist of the said application is to obtain extension of time to lodge notice of appeal to the Court of Appeal of Tanzania against the said Land

Appeal No. 7/2017. Coincidentally, the said Misc. Land Application No. 11 of 2022 was assigned to me which in order to avoid pre-emptying it, I had to determine it first. With respect, having found that the respondent had accounted for the delay, leave to file notice of appeal out of time has been granted. Meanwhile, determining this application will be ultra vires and in contravention of the Constitutional right to appeal. Article 13 (6) (a) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania is relevant. It the circumstances, I hereby strike out this application without costs. The applicant may refile her application after determination of the intended application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal and the intended appeal, in case the said matters will be determined in her favour. It is so ordered. Dated at Moshi this 10th day of November 2022. S.H. Simfukwe Judge 10/ 11/2022 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Order XLIII Rule 35(1) and (2) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 38(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 42(c) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 44(1) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 95 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Article 13(6)(a) of the Constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.