Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

oscar joas kanuna another vs republic 2021 tzhc 9362 14 december 2021

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

Since the value of property involved in the charges exceeds ten million shillings, the High Court is vested with jurisdiction to grant bail, and the applicants are entitled to bail upon fulfillment of statutory conditions.

Court disposition

Bail granted upon fulfillment of specified conditions.

Orders

  • Each applicant shall deposit Tshs 51,412,500/= or immovable property of equivalent value situated within Kagera Region.
  • Each applicant shall have two reliable and credible sureties who shall sign a bond of Tshs 51,412,500/=.
  • Each applicant shall have two credible and reliable sureties with fixed abode within the jurisdiction of the trial court.
  • Each applicant shall surrender all travelling documents (if any) to the deputy registrar, High Court of Tanzania, Bukoba.
  • Each applicant is restricted from travelling outside Kagera Region without prior written consent from the deputy registrar, High Court of Tanzania at Bukoba.
  • Each applicant shall appear in court on all scheduled dates.
  • Bail conditions to be verified by the magistrate at Bukoba Resident Magistrate Court assigned with Misc. Economic Application No. 35 of 2021 before release.

02

Material facts

Parties

Oscar Joas @ Kanuna & Another

Applicants Counsel: Niyikiza Seth

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Juma Mahona

Amounts and remedies

  • Value of Property Involved (total): TZS 102,825,000
  • Deposit Required Per Applicant: TZS 51,412,500
  • Surety Bond Per Applicant: TZS 51,412,500

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Economic Criminal Application / Ruling on Bail Application

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicants argued that they are charged with economic offences involving property valued at Tshs 102,825,000/=, and that section 29(4)(d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act vests the High Court with power to grant bail in such cases. They asserted bail is a constitutional right and expressed readiness to comply with bail conditions.
Respondent
The respondent supported the application, confirming the charges and value involved, and agreed that the High Court is mandated to grant bail under section 29(4)(d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, requesting bail be granted with statutory conditions.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 29(4)(d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap 200 R.E 2019]

    The High Court has exclusive jurisdiction to grant bail in economic offences where the value of property involved is ten million shillings or more.

  2. 02

    General constitutional principles and Economic and Organized Crime Control Act

    Bail is a constitutional right, subject to statutory conditions.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

Since the value of property involved in the charges exceeds ten million shillings, the High Court is vested with jurisdiction to grant bail, and the applicants are entitled to bail upon fulfillment of statutory conditions.

Court disposition

Bail granted upon fulfillment of specified conditions.

  • Each applicant shall deposit Tshs 51,412,500/= or immovable property of equivalent value situated within Kagera Region.
  • Each applicant shall have two reliable and credible sureties who shall sign a bond of Tshs 51,412,500/=.
  • Each applicant shall have two credible and reliable sureties with fixed abode within the jurisdiction of the trial court.
  • Each applicant shall surrender all travelling documents (if any) to the deputy registrar, High Court of Tanzania, Bukoba.
  • Each applicant is restricted from travelling outside Kagera Region without prior written consent from the deputy registrar, High Court of Tanzania at Bukoba.
  • Each applicant shall appear in court on all scheduled dates.
  • Bail conditions to be verified by the magistrate at Bukoba Resident Magistrate Court assigned with Misc. Economic Application No. 35 of 2021 before release.

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 14 December 2021

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 14 December 2021

oscar joas kanuna another vs republic 2021 tzhc 9362 14 december 2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (IN THE DISTRICT REGISTRY OF BUKOBA)

AT BUKOBA MISC. ECONOMIC CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 15 OF 2021 {Arising from the Resident Magistrate Court of Bukoba at Bukoba in Economic Case No. 35 of2021) OSCAR JOAS @ KANUNA & ANOTHER............. —........................ APPLICANTS Versus THE REPUBLIC........................................................................... RESPONDENT

RULING Date of Ruting: 24.12.2021 Mwenda, J.: This is an application brought under sections 29(4) (d) and 36 (1) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [CAP 200 R.E 2019] and section 392 A (1) and (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act [CAP 20 R.E 2019]. It is supported by a chamber summons and an affidavit sworn by Mr. Niyikiza Seth learned Advocate for the applicants. The applicants are praying for the following orders that: 1. That this Honourable court be pleased to grant a bail to Applicants on conditions as this Honourable court may be deemed fit and just to grant, pending hearing and determination of RM Economic Case No. 35 of 2021, proceeding at Bukoba Resident Magistrate Court. i 2. Any other relief (s) as this Honourable court may deem fit and just to grant. When served with the application papers the respondent Republic did not file any counter affidavit. When this matter came for hearing the applicants were present and Mr. Niyikiza Seth stood and argued this application on their behalf. The respondent republic was represented by Mr. Juma Mahona learned state attorney. During submission in support of the applicants' application, Mr. Niyikiza Seth, learned Advocate stated that, the applicants are facing charges for Economic offences before the Resident Magistrate's Court. He said the charge sheet before the subordinate Court contain three counts whereby the second

count and the 3rd counts show that the value of property involved is Tshs 102,825,000/=. The learned advocate submitted that section 29 (4) (d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap 200 R.E 2019] vests powers to the High Court to hear application for bail and grant bail in all cases where the value of the property involved in the offence charged is ten million shillings or more. The learned advocate submitted further that bail is the accuseds' constitutional Right and added that his clients are ready to comply with the bail conditions as shall be set by this court. 2 In response to the submissions by the learned advocate for the applicants, Mr. Juma Mahona, learned state Attorney submitted that, the republic is supporting this application. He said it is true that the applicants are charged before the Resident Magistrate Court in Economic Case No. 35 of 2021 where the value of the property involved is Tshs. 102, 825, 000/=. For that matter, he said, this court is mandated to hear bail application and grant bail in accordance to section 29 (4) (d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap 200 R.E 2019]. He thus prayed this court to grant bail with the conditions as set under section 36 (5) and (6) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap 200 R.E 2019]. Having summarized the submissions by both parties it is clear that the applicants are

charged before the Resident Magistrate Court in Economic Case No. 35 of 2021 for offences falling under the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [CAP 200 R.E 2019]. The value of the property involved in the second count is Tshs 68,550,000/= and for the third count is Tshs 34, 275,000/= both making a total of Tshs 102,825,000/=. It is thus clear that by virtue of section 29 (4) (d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap 200 R.E 2019], it is this court which is vested with powers to hear bail application and grant bail. This section reads as follows; S. 29 (1) N/A 3 (2) N/A (3) N/A (4) The Magistrate shall, before ordering that he be held in remand prison where bail is not petitioned for or is not grated, explained to the accused person his right if he wishes, to petition for bait and for the purpose of this section the power to hear bail application and grant bail. (a) N/A (b) N/A (c) N/A (d) in all cases where the value of any property involved in the offence charged is ten Million Shillings or more at any stage before commencement of the trial before the court is hereby vested in the High Court." That being said this court hereby grant bail to the applicants upon fulfilling the following conditions as stated under section 36 (5) (a), (b), (c) and (d) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap 200 R.E 2019] as follows:- 4 (1) That each applicant

shall deposit 51,412,500/= or immovable property of equivalent value situated within Kagera Region (2) Each applicant shall have two reliable and credible sureties who shall sign a bond of Tshs. 51,412,500/= (3) Each applicant shall have two credible and reliable sureties with fixed abode within the jurisdiction of the trial court. (4) Each applicant shall surrender all travelling documents (if any) to the deputy registrar, High Court of Tanzania, Bukoba. (5) Each applicant is restricted from travelling outside Kagera Region without a prior written consent sought and granted by the deputy Registrar, High Court of Tanzania at Bukoba (6) Each applicant shall be duty bound to appear in court on all dates that shall be scheduled by the court. (7) These bail conditions shall be verified/ ascertained by the magistrate at Bukoba Resident Magistrate Court assigned with Misc. Economic Application No. 35 of 2021 before releasing the applicants on bail as above prescribed. It is so ordered. 24.12.2021 5 This ruling is delivered in chamber under the Seal of this court in the presence of the applicants and their learned counsel Mr. Niyikiza Seth and in the presence of the learned counsel for the respondent Mr. Juma Mahona. 6

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap 200 R.E 2019]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Criminal Procedure Act [Cap 20 R.E 2019]

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.